27-08-2013, 05:56 PM
Logic and reasoning escape you entirely.
You've done nothing to address the FBI's testing of the 60 seconds of camera time to show only the slightest variance in fps... slightly faster at the start, the first 30 seconds (when Zfilmed) and slower at the end..
MORE frames per second - MORE DETAIL during the 75" of assassiantion footage and LESS action missed
FEWER fps (17.9 versus 18.5) later in the film which would result in things like the Greer movements... NOT ENOUGH FRAMES TO CAPTURE THE ACTION since the fps is so slow... which would explain missing some of Greer's head turn.
But you offer nothing nor do you even bother addressing the issue. What Pearse says is ofcourse true... that isn't the point.
A stopwatch on a moving film sure sounds like a real accurate way to measure time...
Do you not understand it did not matter... the variation around 16 or 18 fps was so small and over such a short period of time, your offered argument is rendered moot....
The SS was trying to figure out where two shots COULD have occurred prior to the headshot... they didn't care what the film showed, only what it was supposed to show....
Make your points elsewhere then please Jeff... I prefer not to be bothered by your games any longer and will not be addressing your posts any longer.
there's plenty of room in the playground for you to stay on your own teeter-toter...
:wavey:
You've done nothing to address the FBI's testing of the 60 seconds of camera time to show only the slightest variance in fps... slightly faster at the start, the first 30 seconds (when Zfilmed) and slower at the end..
MORE frames per second - MORE DETAIL during the 75" of assassiantion footage and LESS action missed
FEWER fps (17.9 versus 18.5) later in the film which would result in things like the Greer movements... NOT ENOUGH FRAMES TO CAPTURE THE ACTION since the fps is so slow... which would explain missing some of Greer's head turn.
But you offer nothing nor do you even bother addressing the issue. What Pearse says is ofcourse true... that isn't the point.
A stopwatch on a moving film sure sounds like a real accurate way to measure time...
Do you not understand it did not matter... the variation around 16 or 18 fps was so small and over such a short period of time, your offered argument is rendered moot....
The SS was trying to figure out where two shots COULD have occurred prior to the headshot... they didn't care what the film showed, only what it was supposed to show....
Make your points elsewhere then please Jeff... I prefer not to be bothered by your games any longer and will not be addressing your posts any longer.
there's plenty of room in the playground for you to stay on your own teeter-toter...
:wavey:
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter