John Armstrong's Harvey and Lee

[David Josephs]

Peter, out of all those pictures there are two I would say are odd. But one of them looks tampered with (someone adding black lines/smudges in the facial crevices) and the other is blurred and washed out. The others are variations in photos that you would see in photos of anyone over a period of time. I'm sure we've all got some weird photos of ourselves or others.

I'm not a great fan of Jack White, god rest him.

I have taken his Apollo photos analysis to task many times over the years. He was well out his depth there.

PS.. I'll say again, I agree someone appears to have been impersonatig Oswald at various points.

John,

Maybe you can do us a favor... Visual inspection of these photos is subjective - you see something, or don't - while others see something else... fine.

the favor: Would you address the supporting evidence separate from the photo comparisons?

There are a number - a LARGE number of instances where events in LEE's life should have been evident on the body of the man Ruby killed

SIDE NOTE: if you can find any single photograph of LEE SMILING which shows his front teeth, please post (other than the Voebel photo below)... every image of OSWALD smiling is HARVEY or has been terribly doctored
like the photo of LEE in Japan.

IOswald's aunt, Lillian Murret,remembered this event well. She told the Warren
Commission, "They were coming outof school at 3 o'clock, and there were boys in
back of him and one of them called hisname, and he said, 'Lee,' and when he turned
around, this boy punched him in themouth and ran, and it ran his tooth through the lip,
so she (Marguerite Oswald) had to goover to the school and take him to the dentist, and
I paid for the dentist bill myself ..... "

Theone student who turned and faced Voebel and his camera, in a"clowning" pose, was Lee Oswald.
This was the photograph published inLife Magazine and seen by Myra DaRouse, who said this boy was not Harvey Oswald

{photo of exhumed teeth and LEE at Beauregard JHS}




Next we have a mastoid scar that was noted on the USMC Medical Record form when LEE entered the Marines in 1956...
It notes a 3" 'POST' (posterior) scar along with a small 1/2" scar on his left hand.

{1956 USMC MED RECORDS}

When he LEAVES the USMC in 1959 there is an exit MEDICAL RECORD exam that shows a 5'11" 150lb man with
now a 1" Mastoid scar and 3 other identifying marks

{1959 USMC DISCHARGE}



and finally we have the autopsy fact sheet from Oswald's autopsy.... where would we expect the diligent Dr. ROSE (the man pushed aside by the SS when they took JFK & the man who did Tippit's autopsy)
to note all of the marks on the body - as he has for a number of other small scars found on the body...

FINALLY - Please address why the USMC says LEE is 5'11" in 1959 while the Autopsy tells us he's 5'9" in 1963. People generally do not shrink between the ages 21 and 24..


{Autopsy Body Diagram}

Thanks