John Armstrong's Harvey and Lee

[David Josephs]

I already said I think there is evidence that Oswald was impersonated at various points.

What am I saying is that the photos are not evidence of an Oswald double from 1947 onwards. I'm sorry but I just honestly don't see it

There is nothing in those photos that is proof of two people.

That's what I am saying and I don't believe I'm the only JFK CT that thinks that.

There does appear to be documents that suggest Oswald was in two places at the same time which could be down to identity theft by intelligence agents. Does Case Nagell look like Oswald? Does the Mexican embassy guy look like Oswald?

I totally reject a Marguerite double, I believe that is her in the young and old pictures.

I think the Harvey and Lee (as dopplegangers) thing is the equivalent of 9/11 no planes.

Identity salting and theft, document shenanigans - yes, elaborate body doubles from childhood - no. It's just way too complicated.

Thank you for your opinions John... if you don't see it - you don't.

Stating for a fact that there is nothing in those photos when we have the summer 1953 school records of a 5'4" 115lb boy and the BRONX ZOO photo of supposedly the same child
and he neither looks like LEE and his step-brother agrees, nor is he as big as he is supposed to be.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]5279[/ATTACH]


Yet I do find it suprising that something you find "complicated" removes it from the realm of possibility.... regardless of the physical evidence.

Or that you can reject a theory yet not actually look a bit more deeply into the MANY details and call out where you feel the evidence led us astray.

There is duplicity running throughout the Oswald/JFK case... a human trait - if it works, keep doing it. T
hose that "ran" the conspiracy were using tried and true techniques for creating confusion and cover-up - successful techniques honed over a decade and a half.

Yet you cannot find it possible that Angleton and the CIA's counterintelligence and Russia divisions would not, COULD NOT consider and pull off something of this magnitude
and then use this deception to hide behind during the investigation in order to keep certain doors permenantly shut...

I respectfully disagree with that conclusion... and am willing to delve as deeply into the actual evidence of the two men, two women and the CIA's powers that were, as you'd like.
DJ