21-09-2013, 04:24 PM
Jim Hargrove Wrote:John Mooney Wrote:Jim Hargrove Wrote:Let readers see JA's interview with Pfisterer president Linda Faircloth and decide for themselves. I know, I know, all these lying witnesses... we just have to trust the FBI.
Did you not see the circular reasoning in this video?
They all referred back to McBride for the date. "Every time I asked the question the response would come back, the one you really need to talk to is.... ...the one that you really need to speak to is Palmer McBride".
And this!!!
"I also talked to Palmer McBride after speaking to John Armstrong".
Is John Mooney deliberately misrepresenting this interview, or did he simply not bother to listen to it, like he didn't bother to look at Greg Parker's so-called evidence, evidence that doesn't even relate to the school year in question, evidence in which names are inserted into otherwise identical paragraphs and boiler plate language?
In the interview with John Armstrong, Linda Faircloth mentions Johnny Lepez six or seven times, as well as Louis Fischer, John Otterer, Arthur Stumpf, George Bishoff, and Lionel Slaterer (phonetic spellings). She mentions Palmer McBride twice, and it's really the same reference since the mentions are just a couple of words apart. ONE MENTION!!FORUM MEMBERS: Here again is the link to the six-minute Faircloth interview:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_A_tKDaJPY
Ask yourself, is John Mooney honestly describing this interview, or is he indulging in the same kind of thing most of us here are all too familiar with? I'll be gone for part of today, so no doubt Mr. Mooney will have the time to twist the truth into a pretzel and declare victory eight or ten times, but hey, it's an old story, eh?
Jim
Jim I listened to the video.. it was "the one you need to speak to is... the one you need to speak to is..." all down the line UNTIL we get to "and then I spoke to "John Armstrong and Palmer McBride".
It's the truth.
You know it and I know it.
I have not misrepresented anything.