Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Reasonable doubts about Lee Harvey Oswald
#5
Mr. Savastano (Mister?), you posit a general agreement where such does not exist; to wit:

Yet we agree at least that Oswald was involved in a murderous plot. The true issue is whether he alone killed President Kennedy.

No, Lee Oswald's "involvement" was as patsy; there is no indication he was aware of any "murderous plot"--until he was the accused.

And, no, the "true issue" is not "whether he alone killed President Kennedy"--for he killed no one, not the president, not the policeman.

We examine the eight assertions:

1) No, he most certainly did not own the rifle. Proved conclusively by George Michael Evica and Gil Jesus and others.

2) Brennan? It is to laugh. He had to be led by the hand. Having claimed to possess x-ray vision and see the figure's height and build through a narrow opening.

3) Wounds? There are no "Oswald wounds"--a wound in the front of the throat described by Malcolm Perry (before he became "afraid they were going to kill me") and the wound in the right temple at the hairline seen by several including mortician Tom Robinson, and Dr. Crenshaw (who won his suit against JAMA at the cost of Lundgren's job as editor), resulting in the large wound at the rear seen by eighty-one.

4) Walker? Oswald wasn't a suspect until dead; then Marina was told what to say. Walker said they'd switched the bullet in evidence from the 30.06 to a 6.5. Two men were seen, then left in two cars--Oswald was one man, and did not drive.

5) SBT? Oh, disproven by many, the most recent and most thorough (over sixty pages) is in Sherry Fiester, Enemy of the Truth. Dale "Cartoonist" Myers to the contrary not withstanding (see Pat Speer, "Animania: looking for truth in Dale Myers' hall of mirrors"), there was no single bullet causing seven wounds--the broken chain of custody of CE 399 alone disproves it, as does its intact form unlike any sample bullet produced by the Commission in similar circumstance.

6) Damage? He asks why no damage to the "left" side? Because eighty-one persons saw the baseball-sized blowout of the right occipitoparietal--from the entry at the right temple hairline--from the front, not from the rear.

7) Timing of a trip downstairs? Oswald was not upstairs--he was seen elsewhere--and Vickie Adams and her friend (corroborated by their boss) were on that stairs--and Oswald was not on that stair. (Barry Ernest.)

8) "Veritable mountain"? This author has built another "veritable mountain" of bull excreta.


Reply


Messages In This Thread
Reasonable doubts about Lee Harvey Oswald - by Phil Dragoo - 22-09-2013, 11:18 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Oswald and the Order Forms Gil Jesus 4 371 22-12-2024, 06:27 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  If the case against Oswald was legitimate Gil Jesus 0 353 04-07-2024, 12:11 PM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  Harvey In Hungary Brian Doyle 7 1,351 21-03-2024, 07:03 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Why the Government's Case Against Oswald is BS --- Part III Gil Jesus 0 618 10-12-2023, 12:08 PM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  Why the Govenment's Case Against Oswald is BS --- Part II Gil Jesus 1 706 28-11-2023, 03:36 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Why the Government's case against Oswald is BS --- Part I Gil Jesus 1 749 15-11-2023, 04:55 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Thomas Kelley reports Oswald said he did not view parade Richard Gilbride 1 762 26-09-2023, 04:31 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Evidence of Witness Tampering in the case against Oswald Gil Jesus 0 748 28-07-2023, 11:31 AM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  The REAL reason Oswald went to Irving on 11.21.63 Gil Jesus 1 883 15-06-2023, 03:46 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  The Conspiracy to Kill Lee Harvey Oswald --- Conclusion Gil Jesus 1 1,122 01-04-2023, 04:23 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)