22-09-2013, 08:59 PM
Peter
In addition to the failure of the official lie to explain the "collapse" we have the behaviors of the principals of the national security state
presented in Ryan, Another Nineteen:
A Vonnegut Cat's Cradle:
nice, nice,
very nice:
so many traitors in the same device
FBI Director Freeh, Director of Central Intelligence Tenet
"I see nothing, nothing!"
And they suppressed those who were not so willfully blind.
A few still insist the non-existent heat weakened the steel
much as non-existent single bullet caused seven wounds
An official explanation which explains nothing
followed by an enforcement through suppression of critical thinking
Your information is very compelling; just one example in the following paragraph:
The steel problem was "solved" by NIST by excluding most of the steel from being systematically examined for failure modes and heat excursions. The steel collected by the Port Authority, which has been stored in Hangar 17 at JFK Airport, was not included in the investigation except for 12 pieces. Of the 236 pieces that NIST possessed, many were excluded based on the circular argument that only columns from impact and fire floors were of interest in the investigation. Thus, NIST avoided having to discuss 51 of its 55 core columns. Sample 1 from FEMA's Appendix C was also excluded.
In addition, NIST developed a new method of "visual examination" that it then substituted in place of the systematically used tool. NIST's "paint cracking" method has the following "advantages": paint cracks can be produced not only by high temperature excursions, but also by "corrosion"/ "environmental degradation" and by plastic deformation; many columns had no paint left for examination, Moreover, by relying on a method that requires microscopic examination, NIST was able to ignore pieces that were obviously heat-affected but had come from non-fire floors. A contractor's report that employed common visual examination was "reviewed": NIST contrasted the contractor's results with their newly developed method and their fire exposure observations, and by employing again a circular argument. NIST's steel "examination" shows that its "working hypothesis" was in fact its premise, and that NIST gone to great lengths to maintain this premise.
So, we see a very Red Queen Meets White Knight for Tea with White Rabbit, "We only looked where we wanted to look, and only saw what we wanted to see, and all it means is what we want it to mean."
Now Alice will be given the Acquilla Clemmons warning.
In addition to the failure of the official lie to explain the "collapse" we have the behaviors of the principals of the national security state
presented in Ryan, Another Nineteen:
A Vonnegut Cat's Cradle:
nice, nice,
very nice:
so many traitors in the same device
FBI Director Freeh, Director of Central Intelligence Tenet
"I see nothing, nothing!"
And they suppressed those who were not so willfully blind.
A few still insist the non-existent heat weakened the steel
much as non-existent single bullet caused seven wounds
An official explanation which explains nothing
followed by an enforcement through suppression of critical thinking
Your information is very compelling; just one example in the following paragraph:
The steel problem was "solved" by NIST by excluding most of the steel from being systematically examined for failure modes and heat excursions. The steel collected by the Port Authority, which has been stored in Hangar 17 at JFK Airport, was not included in the investigation except for 12 pieces. Of the 236 pieces that NIST possessed, many were excluded based on the circular argument that only columns from impact and fire floors were of interest in the investigation. Thus, NIST avoided having to discuss 51 of its 55 core columns. Sample 1 from FEMA's Appendix C was also excluded.
In addition, NIST developed a new method of "visual examination" that it then substituted in place of the systematically used tool. NIST's "paint cracking" method has the following "advantages": paint cracks can be produced not only by high temperature excursions, but also by "corrosion"/ "environmental degradation" and by plastic deformation; many columns had no paint left for examination, Moreover, by relying on a method that requires microscopic examination, NIST was able to ignore pieces that were obviously heat-affected but had come from non-fire floors. A contractor's report that employed common visual examination was "reviewed": NIST contrasted the contractor's results with their newly developed method and their fire exposure observations, and by employing again a circular argument. NIST's steel "examination" shows that its "working hypothesis" was in fact its premise, and that NIST gone to great lengths to maintain this premise.
So, we see a very Red Queen Meets White Knight for Tea with White Rabbit, "We only looked where we wanted to look, and only saw what we wanted to see, and all it means is what we want it to mean."
Now Alice will be given the Acquilla Clemmons warning.