23-09-2013, 07:15 PM
(This post was last modified: 23-09-2013, 10:06 PM by C. Savastano.)
(to P. Dragoo)
Your unfortunately broad painting of our philosophical opponents does not help your case. Also listing evidence and using reason to persuade will always ultimately be more successful long term, strong arm hypothesis and insults are the weapons of the uninformed critic. If some will not listen to evidence it is their choice, however this does not render them complicit it means they have not done the work or are do not care as much as we do, not everyone who disagrees is involved, attacks will not inspire them to see the truth, reasonable unbiased facts and discussion might.
Thanks David, your maps and info are welcome additions.
Your unfortunately broad painting of our philosophical opponents does not help your case. Also listing evidence and using reason to persuade will always ultimately be more successful long term, strong arm hypothesis and insults are the weapons of the uninformed critic. If some will not listen to evidence it is their choice, however this does not render them complicit it means they have not done the work or are do not care as much as we do, not everyone who disagrees is involved, attacks will not inspire them to see the truth, reasonable unbiased facts and discussion might.
Thanks David, your maps and info are welcome additions.