26-09-2013, 02:20 AM
(This post was last modified: 26-09-2013, 02:42 AM by C. Savastano.)
No evidence? Do the nineteen pieces of it in the article seem like not enough. Please offer me some evidence thus far its been opinion. Brennan was in my article and his uselessness is documented by the Commission despite their findings. Indeed I am saying that reasonable doubts (multiple) exist, thus he would be found innocent if he could have received a trial. I have posted the evidence its in the article, if you find one that is not true please let me know. Another questions what is your intent in the repeated questions? If you wish to end the conversation why do you keep making requests? Now why don't you answer a question what can you prove I am incorrect about, otherwise its just speculation, repeating that you do not find unbiased facts in my work and offering no work or sources of your own to support your point is not a reasonable way to debate. You also did not address the automatic dismissal you seem to have those who do not agree with you, however I assume this oversight was intended.
Among the things I believe prove that Lee Harvey Oswald could not have committed the crime are the Carcano was possibly defective and the company who bought the Lot Oswald's weapon later emerged from was suing its supplier, the Carcano took at least two seconds to aim and fire with any accuracy, the Carcano was the second gun reported in the case by officials, the Carcano was a notoriously unpredictable weapon that would misfire, the Carcano was from WWII stock, the bullets were also at least a decade old, if Oswald were the sharpshooter some claim he chose the worst kind of weapon and ammunition to undertake his crime. That is one of the reasons I believe reasonable doubt exists, However, no series of facts about most evidence proves the overall claim of conspiracy, but if its one of many considered, it overwhelmingly creates doubts in the minds of reasonable people. In my view there are hundreds of these facts and supporting pieces of evidence that can prove a conspiracy occurred. When considered together and with reasonable connections supported even by official documents, the governments case will be reduced to ashes. So what do you think an unassailable fact is?
Among the things I believe prove that Lee Harvey Oswald could not have committed the crime are the Carcano was possibly defective and the company who bought the Lot Oswald's weapon later emerged from was suing its supplier, the Carcano took at least two seconds to aim and fire with any accuracy, the Carcano was the second gun reported in the case by officials, the Carcano was a notoriously unpredictable weapon that would misfire, the Carcano was from WWII stock, the bullets were also at least a decade old, if Oswald were the sharpshooter some claim he chose the worst kind of weapon and ammunition to undertake his crime. That is one of the reasons I believe reasonable doubt exists, However, no series of facts about most evidence proves the overall claim of conspiracy, but if its one of many considered, it overwhelmingly creates doubts in the minds of reasonable people. In my view there are hundreds of these facts and supporting pieces of evidence that can prove a conspiracy occurred. When considered together and with reasonable connections supported even by official documents, the governments case will be reduced to ashes. So what do you think an unassailable fact is?