26-09-2013, 09:19 AM
C. Savastano
Your second paragraph above presents the Mannlicher Carcano as a "defective", "unpredictable", "worst kind of weapon"--
--but are you not aware of the work of George Michael Evica, Gil Jesus and John Armstrong in establishing that Lee Oswald never owned such a weapon?
You are merely speculating that Oswald would exhibit the good judgment to eschew an inferior weapon--
--when his very ownership of such a weapon has not and cannot be established.
Do you require proof, convincing, being led to these sources?
Your sole pronouncement on Lee Oswald and the alleged murder weapon begins with one of the primary false premises of the frame-up:
namely, that Lee Oswald ever owned such a weapon.
Neither owned, nor ordered, paid for, picked up, practiced with, stored, transported, delivered, used, hid such a weapon.
An entire chain of allegations failing at every link.
It is far more compelling exculpatory evidence than your speculating Lee Oswald would have chosen a superior weapon.
I indeed characterize those who cling to the lone-nut/magic-bullet theory as cognitively impaired or complicit.
The meaning of those clauses: 1) they are not thinking effectively; 2) they are promoting propaganda.
The latter class operates from the a priori premise Lee Oswald and only Lee Oswald.
In the former class, I have, as you have, convinced the incomplete thinking persons to follow me in the easy disproof of Lee Oswald's agency in the assassination, and it is always a priority--and a pleasure.
When we see Lee Oswald never owned such a weapon we proceed to the magic bullet CE 399 with its single bullet trajectory which did not occur, further demonstrating conspiracy.
The official explanation relies upon Lee Oswald with the Mannlicher Carcano shooting three and only three bullets one of them being Commission Exhibit 399 which caused seven wounds in two men.
The destruction of the single bullet theory has been done by several researchers.
A veritable Riverdance of refutation has been performed.
Now, I do agree with you that the Mannlicher Carcano was junk, but did you know it was used by the right-wing Senator Dodd in his committee work?
George Michael Evica discusses this:
http://karws.gso.uri.edu/jfk/the_critics...Evica.html
David Josephs and the money order:
https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/sho...#post74185
George Michael Evica on the rifle:
https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/sho...#post74545
The Smoking Guns: Rifle and Pistol by John Armstrong:
http://harveyandlee.net/Guns/Guns.html
Gil Jesus' very large page on "the rifle":
http://www.giljesus.com/jfk/rifle.htm
Lee Oswald was no more in the window with that weapon than he was with a guitar.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]5318[/ATTACH]
Your second paragraph above presents the Mannlicher Carcano as a "defective", "unpredictable", "worst kind of weapon"--
--but are you not aware of the work of George Michael Evica, Gil Jesus and John Armstrong in establishing that Lee Oswald never owned such a weapon?
You are merely speculating that Oswald would exhibit the good judgment to eschew an inferior weapon--
--when his very ownership of such a weapon has not and cannot be established.
Do you require proof, convincing, being led to these sources?
Your sole pronouncement on Lee Oswald and the alleged murder weapon begins with one of the primary false premises of the frame-up:
namely, that Lee Oswald ever owned such a weapon.
Neither owned, nor ordered, paid for, picked up, practiced with, stored, transported, delivered, used, hid such a weapon.
An entire chain of allegations failing at every link.
It is far more compelling exculpatory evidence than your speculating Lee Oswald would have chosen a superior weapon.
I indeed characterize those who cling to the lone-nut/magic-bullet theory as cognitively impaired or complicit.
The meaning of those clauses: 1) they are not thinking effectively; 2) they are promoting propaganda.
The latter class operates from the a priori premise Lee Oswald and only Lee Oswald.
In the former class, I have, as you have, convinced the incomplete thinking persons to follow me in the easy disproof of Lee Oswald's agency in the assassination, and it is always a priority--and a pleasure.
When we see Lee Oswald never owned such a weapon we proceed to the magic bullet CE 399 with its single bullet trajectory which did not occur, further demonstrating conspiracy.
The official explanation relies upon Lee Oswald with the Mannlicher Carcano shooting three and only three bullets one of them being Commission Exhibit 399 which caused seven wounds in two men.
The destruction of the single bullet theory has been done by several researchers.
A veritable Riverdance of refutation has been performed.
Now, I do agree with you that the Mannlicher Carcano was junk, but did you know it was used by the right-wing Senator Dodd in his committee work?
George Michael Evica discusses this:
http://karws.gso.uri.edu/jfk/the_critics...Evica.html
David Josephs and the money order:
https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/sho...#post74185
George Michael Evica on the rifle:
https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/sho...#post74545
The Smoking Guns: Rifle and Pistol by John Armstrong:
http://harveyandlee.net/Guns/Guns.html
Gil Jesus' very large page on "the rifle":
http://www.giljesus.com/jfk/rifle.htm
Lee Oswald was no more in the window with that weapon than he was with a guitar.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]5318[/ATTACH]