01-11-2008, 07:47 AM
Jan Klimkowski Wrote:The terrain is littered with clues - some lead to Kansas, others to Maeterlinck's "bird that is blue". A few lead to Manchuria...
Scottish Rite Freemasonry... the search for the essence of schizophrenia - literally a liquid, chemical, schizophrenia... medical & occult investigations into the consequences of severe trauma...
This is fascinating, Jan, so much so - to me, at least - that I urge you to return to the subject as time, inclination and further info permit. I raise this and related issues chiefly because I am constantly astonished at the "modernity" and sophistication of the Lincoln assassination plot, a sense that leads me to suspect other aspects of CIA work in this area had equally deep roots.
Jan Klimkowski Wrote:Anthony Burgess' "A Clockwork Orange" was apparently based on his knowledge of real (and still classified) mind control & behaviour modification experiments conducted in Fort Bliss - home to many of the Paperclip Nazi scientists. Burgess did of course work for both British military intelligence & the Colonial Service...
A loathsome piece of work, Burgess, one requiring a really good biog...
Jan Klimkowski Wrote:It's a good question and one that always needs to be asked - even if it can't be answered with absolute certainty.
Here are some observations - no more than that.
If there's a highly planned, multi-shooter, assassination planned, a patsy can be seen as a vital part of the operation. The patsy - especially if highly visible like Sirhan - provides a distraction enabling the real assassins to escape. The patsy also enables Official Story #1 (and maybe a few more layers of the onion skin) to be spoonfed to a press desperate for certainty and answers.
So, why use a hypno-programmed patsy?
They're probably more reliable - eg they won't have second thoughts and run away at the crucial moment.
They're more incoherent when captured - Sirhan being a perfect example.
Dr Louis Jolyon West, godfather of MK-ULTRA, spent a lot of time with Sirhan in his cell, and was quite possibly marvelling at the "technology". I think there was huge arrogance amongst the black doctors (with Ewen Cameron epitomising this). And a sense that they were essentially untouchable.
I always think of the US Navy psychologist, Lt Commander Dr Thomas Narut, in this context. In 1975, at a NATO conference in Oslo, Narut casually briefed assembled military correspondents about a secret Navy (almost certainly ONI) programme to identify suitable subjects who could be turned into programmed hitmen and assassins. He said there were hundreds of such subjects.
The story was published in the (London) Times, subsequently denied by military sources, and Narut never surfaced again (to my knowledge). But the fact a military shrink would so talk so willingly about such a subject is, imo, a sign of the arrogance and sense of invulnerability of the deep black doctors.
All excellent thoughts/observations, to which I'd add that a surving assassin, hypno-programmed or not, also serves as an elite control mechanism, one capable of keeping the assassination technicians firmly on the establishment's lead.
Paul