02-10-2013, 02:00 PM
[quote=Tony Szamboti][quote=Peter Presland] By the time the Twin Tower would have become visible to the 'pilot' of those planes, their altitude/speed combination, as descibed in the OCT, would have rendered them uncontrollable by even the most experienced of pilots.
[Quote]
Dynamic air pressure is a function of velocity squared and altitude since the density of air changes with it. Aircraft moving at 530 mph at sea level would experience pressure that is 11 times greater than landing speeds of 160 mph. The control surfaces are optimized for landing and takeoff speeds below 200 mph. So any little overshoot of movement on the controls by a human pilot would cause a major attitude change in the aircraft.
I have read that experienced pilots are lucky to hit those buildings 1 out of 10 times at the high speeds in a simulator.
It seems pretty clear that the aircraft were remotely controlled into the buildings by auto-pilot machines and homing devices. The south tower aircraft was actually heading towards NY City Hall until it was just two miles away from the building when it made a dramatic high speed turn towards it at five seconds away and then a precise adjustment just two seconds away. A human pilot would have been nosing for the building from a significant distance out.[/Quote]
Speculation... and where did you get 1 in 10? You just make facts up don't you?
If there were homing devices why were the tower's hit differently?
Why did the 4th plane not hit it's target?
Did or did not a plane hit the pentagon?
If *they* had so much control of avionics and control of the air defenses etc... why not have 4 strikes with perfect precision so everyone could watch it on live TV?
[Quote]
Dynamic air pressure is a function of velocity squared and altitude since the density of air changes with it. Aircraft moving at 530 mph at sea level would experience pressure that is 11 times greater than landing speeds of 160 mph. The control surfaces are optimized for landing and takeoff speeds below 200 mph. So any little overshoot of movement on the controls by a human pilot would cause a major attitude change in the aircraft.
I have read that experienced pilots are lucky to hit those buildings 1 out of 10 times at the high speeds in a simulator.
It seems pretty clear that the aircraft were remotely controlled into the buildings by auto-pilot machines and homing devices. The south tower aircraft was actually heading towards NY City Hall until it was just two miles away from the building when it made a dramatic high speed turn towards it at five seconds away and then a precise adjustment just two seconds away. A human pilot would have been nosing for the building from a significant distance out.[/Quote]
Speculation... and where did you get 1 in 10? You just make facts up don't you?
If there were homing devices why were the tower's hit differently?
Why did the 4th plane not hit it's target?
Did or did not a plane hit the pentagon?
If *they* had so much control of avionics and control of the air defenses etc... why not have 4 strikes with perfect precision so everyone could watch it on live TV?