02-10-2013, 10:14 PM
R.K. Locke Wrote:Anybody who looks at all of the evidence and concludes that 9/11 was anything other than MIHOP is simply not credible.
Locke,
That is your opinion. And clearly based on what you consider to be evidence of an inside job. I've been looking at the matter for more than a decade and at best the evidence for insider intent is ambiguous. There is not smoking gun and no confessions or leaks. it's all circumstantial connecting dots YOU want to see as being there and as evidence.
But you are entitled to your opinion... I consider my position credible.