03-10-2013, 02:52 AM
(This post was last modified: 03-10-2013, 04:02 AM by Tony Szamboti.)
Jeffrey Orling Wrote:Tony Szamboti Wrote:Dynamic air pressure is a function of velocity squared and altitude since the density of air changes with it. Aircraft moving at 530 mph at sea level would experience pressure that is 11 times greater than landing speeds of 160 mph. The control surfaces are optimized for landing and takeoff speeds below 200 mph. So any little overshoot of movement on the controls by a human pilot would cause a major attitude change in the aircraft.
I have read that experienced pilots are lucky to hit those buildings 1 out of 10 times at the high speeds in a simulator.
It seems pretty clear that the aircraft were remotely controlled into the buildings by auto-pilot machines and homing devices. The south tower aircraft was actually heading towards NY City Hall until it was just two miles away from the building when it made a dramatic high speed turn towards it at five seconds away and then a precise adjustment just two seconds away. A human pilot would have been nosing for the building from a significant distance out.
Speculation... and where did you get 1 in 10? You just make facts up don't you?
Watch this video made by Pilots for 911 Truth about controllability problems at high speeds at low altitude. A Check Airman for one of the airlines discusses the problems experienced pilots had hitting the WTC towers in ten tries each in a simulator at those speeds starting at 28:50, and that they couldn't do it in those ten tries and could only do it when they slowed to landing speeds.
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index...c=19732&hl=
You really should watch the entire video, as you can't know much about dynamic pressure and controllability if you think it was easy to do.
There is definitely something wrong with the hijackers piloting the aircraft into the buildings story.