Demolition Access To The WTC Towers - Kevin Ryan

[Jeffrey Orling]

The policy of pre emptive war was adapted POST 9/11. I suppose it was pushed through as an acceptable policy because waiting to be attacked first had devastating consequences.

The policy of preemptive war has nothing to do with a real threat of being attacked, it is purely a way to make wars of aggression tolerable to the public. In case of Afghanistan, the plan to invade was complete weeks before 9/11 and in case of Iraq the planning started immediately on 9/11, despite any evidence that Iraq posed any danger or had anything to do with 9/11. Both wars violated international law in the boldest way.
There is no justification for a preemptive war.

I suspect that the DOD has had war plans for every nation in the ME for decades which are continuously being updated as local conditions and world alliances evolve. W's energy buds had meetings in the WH which were secret and it's likely that they discussed how to get at the oil in the ME and perhaps finishing off Sadam was as good an excuse as any. They need a pretext for waging war!

The trouble with raising the notion of false flags all the time, is that the US policies actually provoke locals around the world who are victims of the US corps and MIC to push back. This is undeniable.

Expanding the empire is not easy for a democracy. It's not lawful. At best the US can advocate for free markets and so forth and boy do they ever do that... try to control the world economy, local economies and the resources around the world. Corporations don't play by the rules of nations. They are non state actors too. What has happened of course, is that the MIC and the DOD has been the muscle for the corps (notice their revolving doors)... and now they are locked together in common interest... conquering and control of the world.

DOD is not really about defending the US but advancing control and influence of US corporations around the world... but it can't simply attack and take over a nation and grab what they want... They can't even do that when they try... witness Vietnam, and Iraq... and Afghanistan.

The MIC uses the CIA to engage in black ops (POTUS's covert foreign policy action group)... criminal activities to advance US *interests*... read corporate interests. They assassinate and run drugs and weapons and manage coups and insurgent groups like the Contras (there are dozens of examples)... they bribe placed puppets in developing countries. All of this is well known. And the locals occasionally kick back and they are EXPECTED to kick back. Why wouldn't they? The Palestinians are? Gandhi did. Mandela did... Che did... etc. The US has re configured its strategies to fight insurgencies... because no nation is going to attack the US... (the weapons race is a hard sell now. With out attack there is no cause for a retribution. So 9/11 would do fine for them...And it was an attack and it was one that was on the intel radar if we are to believe people like Rowley and Edmonds. Any excuse works for them and of course ANY attack would be compared to Pearl Harbor and the MIC advocate for a similar response - WAR. Anyone who thinks otherwise is naive.

The historians knew this, the think tanks knew it and the right wing chicken hawk ones had wet dreams about an attack on the US to be able to point to Pearl Harbor. Didn't work for Khobar towers, USS Cole, or Nairobi Embassy. US people did not clamor for an attack... Who was the DOD to wage war on when a rubber boat exploded next to the Cole?

Sure they exploited 9/11 and considering how many people were killed the demand for blood was easy to fulfill... They had the plans.. they were ready to roll out. Out came their war plans... and they've been years and years in the making. That's what the tens of thousands who work in the pentagon are doing... planning for wars! And breeding the excuses for them.