After fifty years...

[Marc Ellis]

Is there much, if anything that everyone can agree on, as being *fact*?
I mean, unarguable, indisputable fact? This of course excludes Lone Nut
ideas. I'm speaking strictly of agreement amongst those who agree that JFK's murder
was in fact, the result of a conspiracy.

I mean this as a sincere question. I've wondered this for some time now.

Everybody, even Lone-Nutters, the WC, HSCA & research community seem to agree on this.

1. Oswald stamped '544 Camp Street, New Orleans, LA' on some of his Fair Play for Cuba' leaflets.
2. That same building also housed Guy Bannister's office. (531 Lafayette).
3. 544 Camp Street was once the address of the anti-Castro Cuban Revolutionary Council.
4. Oswald never rented any space at the 544 Camp Street/531 Lafayette address.

These are facts everyone agrees on. They've been agreed upon for almost 50 years.
What are the best-reasoned conclusions we can draw from these agreed-upon facts?

There are probably other such facts. Oswald's dates in Russia, his military marksmanship scores.

I think it's a good approach to lay out the facts everyone agrees on and then test the
conclusions the various advocates derive from the agreed-upon facts.

The 544 Camp Street fact leads me to a conclusion that is incompatible with Oswald being a Castro-sympathizer. Wherever possible, when I hear or read someone telling me Oswald was pro-Castro, I raise the question of 544 Camp Street. It's a fact we all agree on. It raises certain questions about where Oswald's sympathies really were.