Sean Murphy's research deserves more

[Lauren Johnson]

It's also possible the reason Baker didn't mention Oswald in his first affidavit is because he encountered Oswald again on the 4th floor landing. Having seen two Oswalds in two different places Baker may have been clued to leave this unmentioned until further notified. That would explain the lack of curiosity about this 4th floor person at the time. It doesn't make sense that Baker would draw a gun on the lunchroom Oswald but then not confront the 4th floor person who was much closer to the crime scene Baker was running towards. The lack of description of the 4th floor person and original lack of mention of the lunchroom encounter could be explained by Baker encountering one Oswald after another.

This makes sense because having been told by Truly that Oswald was one of ours Baker might not be inclined to confront him if he saw him again on the 4th floor.

How did Oswald beat Baker to the 4th floor? Or wait, let me guess, he figured Oswald had a twin brother working there, and if Oswald was okay, that automatically made the twin okay.

Hey Bob, I just finished ... gasp pant ... reading the Sean Murphy thread. It was pretty impressive considering I have been an "Oswald-was-not-on-the-front-steps" guy. Whoever was there, he was spooky or should we say Spooky? He apparently comes out just as the motorcade goes by and DOESN'T MOVE -- as if he is showing up for work. He doesn't run out to the island and then the parking lot with Lovelady. He just stays there.