Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Sean Murphy's research deserves more
The testimony that made it to the Commission said Carolyn left at 12:15 with a group headed to the front to see the motorcade.


Golz says Mrs Arnold said 12:25 and that her alleged sighting of Oswald on the 1st floor was something she didn't say. So since we have evidence of falsification is it more or less likely that the 12:15 was also fabricated? Mrs Arnold was not invited to the Warren Commission hearings. It seems to me that anything other than the established 12:25 in the 2nd floor lunchroom, as per Mrs Arnold, would be using the Warren Report as reference.


Oh, by the way Bob, why didn't you answer this?:



Quote:As I said before and you ignored, if you went to the witness template for other Oswald sightings you would see a strong showing of speaking up from Ralph Yates to Carolyn Arnold, to Bogard, to Roger Craig, to Carousel witnesses seeing Oswald in the shadows, and all the other known Oswald sightings I'm sure you're familiar with. There is no such outward, direct case like Oswald standing right in front of everybody on the Depository front steps, with all the dozens of witnesses who would have seen him right in front of them, without any mention at all. You will find no other exposure of Oswald in the assassination with such a 100% consistency of lack of witnessing. What you are doing is trying to place Lee Harvey Oswald in the Assassination's Times Square at high noon without anyone seeing him. Again, to me this is an obvious common sense issue. I think you are trying to suggest silence by intimidation but it just doesn't play against that overall template. Your scenario still requires Oswald to mingle in with the crowd in the doorway where their attention would be on each other at the Baker juncture. It just doesn't wash Bob.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Sean Murphy's research deserves more - by Albert Doyle - 03-03-2014, 07:51 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Dirty Research Community Under James Gordon Brian Doyle 1 133 21-02-2025, 05:59 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Schnapf Threatens Credibility Of JFK Research Brian Doyle 1 147 27-01-2025, 07:13 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Roger Odisio Plants Credibility Time Bomb At Heart Of CT Research Brian Doyle 8 2,003 07-06-2024, 06:18 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Jim Hargrove Chooses Politics Over Good Research Brian Doyle 0 499 12-01-2024, 10:17 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  The JFK Research Community Is Responsible For This Brian Doyle 0 560 28-11-2023, 04:48 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  How The Education Forum Destroyed Credible JFK Research Brian Doyle 8 1,975 09-07-2023, 09:35 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  DiEugenio Betrays Conspiracy Research Brian Doyle 1 868 07-07-2023, 04:32 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  EXCELLENT Research on LHO & Ruth Hyde Paine [and family] - Linda Minor Peter Lemkin 15 41,146 29-07-2019, 08:06 PM
Last Post: Tom Scully
  JFK Research Methodology James Lateer 19 29,373 02-07-2018, 04:00 PM
Last Post: James Lateer
  Sean Murphy- wrong again!!! Richard Gilbride 15 13,506 01-02-2017, 12:18 AM
Last Post: Scott Kaiser

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)