16-03-2014, 08:19 AM
I'm not a big fan of Jim Stone. Far too cock-sure of himself in a rah rah Alex Jones sort of style for my money. However, this series of posts does explore (and nail??) the technicalities of the remote radar-jam/spoof transponder/remote control-fly-land capabilities of a modern US-NATO AWACS plane. Taking account of the apparent total blank on wreckage; the reports from the Malaysian government-military, the blatant photo-shopping of the pictures of the 'asylum-seeking false passport' passengers (same legs on both pics - oops); the boeing satellite techie monitoring of the engines; the cell-phones and many other bits and pieces, it seems to me that the theory with the highest probability right now is that the plane WAS hijacked (with or without the cooperation of someone on board) and HAS been landed on one of the US military's myriad lilly-pad outposts within range of the last known position.
Motive , and the fate of the 239 souls on board at this point are subjects for much further pondering - Jim Stone's WWIII being a possibility but provided with far to much of a slam-dunk 'it's obvious init?' style for me to give it much more than cursory attention.
Motive , and the fate of the 239 souls on board at this point are subjects for much further pondering - Jim Stone's WWIII being a possibility but provided with far to much of a slam-dunk 'it's obvious init?' style for me to give it much more than cursory attention.
Quote:NOW LET'S GET TO REALITY AND MOTIVEShttp://www.jimstonefreelance.com/
FACT: Flight 370 stayed logged into satellites which cannot be jammed without blacking out the whole portion of the world they cover (which would be obvious). True, if you thought of it you could jam the receiver on the jet quite easily, but that won't prevent the jet itself from maintaining an outbound transmission to the satellite, which if jammed would freak out the satellite because you would have to point a jamming signal at the satellite and overwhelm it so badly all the other planes would lose their connections at the same time. If you want your plane theft to be as secret as possible, you can't jam the sattelite.
One thing with the satellite is that it cannot tell where the plane actually is, it will only know it got signal. You would need three separate satellites all logged into the same plane to figure out where the plane was, and Boeing uses only one log in for obvious economic reasons. Boeing cannot find that plane, they can only say it was in fact alive.
FACT: The plane survived and landed somewhere. AND THE NSA KNOWS EXACTLY WHERE BECAUSE THE CELL PHONES RANG AND IT WAS NOT DEAD RINGING BECAUSE ONE PICKED UP. Ditto for the cell carriers, all of them which are no doubt owned by Kikedom and will keep their mouths shut. WE KNOW WHO DID THIS, "FAILURE" TO LOCATE THOSE PHONES PROVES WHO DID THIS WITH A SINGLE FACT.
FACT: The entire arab hijacker meme is so worn out and provably CIA that we know that fake passport story belongs in the trash. Add the faked photos for an additional laugh. Why did they push this line? Just like Awacs, all military systems have multiple purposes. When the military system is in the information spectrum in the form of a psy op, they are going to get as much use out of any situation as they possibly can. So while they waterboard those chinese military experts, probably as a precursor to getting military secrets before the waterboarders and their controllers launch world war 3, they decided it would be useful to try to frame up IRAN and blame the plane's dissapearance on them and use THAT as a reason to start the war they seeked to get an advantage in by kidnapping flight 370 and stealing the Chinese engineers.
FACT: The first thing to go with jamming would be the transponder. Jamming would also keep the pilots from radioing out. Jamming would have a harder time spoofing all radars, and THAT is the part of the plan that did not go perfect, as it would be expected. And I would guess that the plane was taken to a location, most likely Afghanistan, where NO ONE would say a peep about it being there and it would not matter if it was on radar or not.
In fact, once the plane was actually stolen, it would be possible to only jam it's communications, stop spoofing radar, and identify the plane as something else via a fake beacon on the Awacs plane to get it through another nation's radar shield without anyone knowing what it was. THAT is what probably really happened.
Peter Presland
".....there is something far worse than Nazism, and that is the hubris of the Anglo-American fraternities, whose routine is to incite indigenous monsters to war, and steer the pandemonium to further their imperial aims"
Guido Preparata. Preface to 'Conjuring Hitler'[size=12][size=12]
"Never believe anything until it has been officially denied"
Claud Cockburn
[/SIZE][/SIZE]
".....there is something far worse than Nazism, and that is the hubris of the Anglo-American fraternities, whose routine is to incite indigenous monsters to war, and steer the pandemonium to further their imperial aims"
Guido Preparata. Preface to 'Conjuring Hitler'[size=12][size=12]
"Never believe anything until it has been officially denied"
Claud Cockburn
[/SIZE][/SIZE]