17-03-2014, 08:28 AM
(This post was last modified: 17-03-2014, 08:54 AM by Peter Lemkin.)
Paul Rigby Wrote:Peter Lemkin Wrote:Yes, the oddest thing about the disappearance of the plane is no one claiming it was done in the name of or against the name of X, Y, or Z.
Uighur separatists' claim over missing flight MH370 may be re-examined
15 March 2014
http://www.news.com.au/national/uighur-s...6855911080
Quote:CLAIMS by a Malay newspaper that a 35-year-old Uighur man from China's troubled autonomous Muslim province was on Flight MH370 may be looked at in new light after being written off as irrelevant.
An email sent to journalists, supposedly from representatives from the Uighur separatist movement, claimed for responsibility for the Malaysia Airlines flight's disappearance.
The emails were dismissed as opportunistic and troublemaking...
Uighur rebel Abdullah Mansour told Reuters from an undisclosed location Pakistan in recent days that the intent was to bring the Holy Fight to China.
"The fight against China is our Islamic responsibility and we have to fulfil it," he said.
Pakistan is also along Mr Razak's so-called Kazakhstan‎ corridor.
Malaysia's continued interest in searching the Andaman Sea, far west of MH370's route to China, is intriguing.
If the plane had turned west from the South China Sea, then turned northwest towards Kazakhstan, it would have taken a direct path over Uighur heartland but also over many other countries.
In December, the US released the last of three of 22 Uighurs that had been detained in Guantánamo Bay since 2001, after being detained for fighting with the Taliban. The men were taken by Slovakia, because China would not take them.
I'm certainly willing to entertain this line of speculation, but at this point it seems most odd that IF some Uighur group made such a claim [and it was ignored by the World], they would not make the claim over and over again, until it was 'heard'. Their prime target would logically be China - and it is possible that China has 'heard' it loud and clear, but is playing deaf. I find it hard to imagine how one person on a flight, no matter how well trained, could have effected what apparently happened. The more one learns about this event, the more one grasps that whoever [singular, but much more likely plural] engineered this was very, very aware of the technical aspects of the plane and its systems, as well as flight protocol. The last seemingly innocuous voice message heard from the plane was just after one of two systems had been turned off - and the other was turned off just after the 'innocuous' message. The message was timed when the airliner was about to be handed from Malay to Vietnamese Airtraffic Controllers. It is not strange that the Vietnamese did not quickly react, as it is normal that a plane entering their airspace on a normal flight would wait some time to make contact. This allowed those in control of the plane time to change the flight path unknown to anyone on the ground [by usual means]. I find it hard to believe that one or even a group of Uighur's had the sophisticated knowledge to do this - and find it more plausible they would attempt something like this on an Air China plane.
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass