MH 370: Missing Malaysian Airliner

[Peter Lemkin]

The 'authorities' have apparently admitted that the signal they picked up was at 33.3 KHz rather than 37.5 KHz - which is the specification for the flight recorders. Why the change? Doesn't make sense according to electronics - even if batteries are low. Like every black operation I've studied the NUMEROUS 'chance' anomalies are too numerous to make the event an 'accident' but instead a planned operation - from start to finish - through cover-up. There are SO many strange chance events in this saga....yet another is that the Chinese just happen to have the deepest operating unmanned submersible for imaging/sonar/recovery [7000 m].

Keep in mind that unless the signal is digital and narrowly defined, it will be heard across more than one single exact frequency. A radio signal can be described as a peak, with a leading and a trailing edge, so that what the "authorities" may be trying to say in their technically imprecise manner is that the signal was present on 37.5 kHz but peaked at 33.3 kHz. The question, of course, is how precise the beacon actually is.

It is not a radio frequency, but an acoustic frequency, and both the sending unit and the sensors are highly tuned. Yes, some spread is possible, but 10% is very surprising and odd. These are built to be tuned to 37.5 because it is not found in the ocean outside of human sources - and none of the 'usual' human sources. The specs for the units are available online and rigorous. The peak of the signal should be at or very close to the specs - and the strongest part of the signal.