13-07-2009, 08:28 PM
Paul Rigby Wrote:Charles Drago Wrote:But the Greer theory, like the umbrella gun/dart theory and so many other JFK-related red herrings, has been promoted...in the main by forces aiding and abetting the cover-up.
Dulles to Humes: “Just another question. Am I correct in assuming from what you say that this wound is entirely inconsistent with a wound that might have been administered if the shot were fired from in front of or beside of the President: it had to be fired from behind the President?” [2WCH360].
Someone, CD, and not just a little ole anyone, was mighty concerned by the notion that Greer did it.
Paul,
"In front of" means only that; distance is not implied.
"Beside" means only that; distance is not implied.
Your inferences are unsustainable absent truly compelling evidence.
The questions, I suggest, were posed to support the pre-ordained "from behind" lie.
"From behind" means only that; distance is not implied.
Now unless you suggest that "from behind" implies "from the trunk," your argument as buttressed in the last post remains wholly unconvincing.