Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Discrediting Secret Service complicity in the elimination of JFK…
#30
Charles Drago Wrote:And speaking of motive, please tell us why Greer would have done the deed. Just give me a minute while I brace for more suppositions-as-facts.

With pleasure, and all factual:

Let’s begin with the biographical. He came from a land where Irish Catholic life was (and in many respects remains) cheap, and the hatred of Romanists venomous. My interpretation? No: His son’s, as conveyed by Vince Palamara:

http://www.assassinationresearch.com/v4n...pter08.pdf

Second, let us consider the powerful institutional motivation driving the SS bureaucracy along the course of collusion with the Cold Warriors in CIA and at the Pentagon:

David Talbot, Brothers, p.22:

Quote: “Even before Dallas, Bobby Kennedy seemed to be losing confidence in the ability [more accurately, the will – PR] of the Secret Service to protect his brother…At the time of the assassination, Kennedy was backing a bill, H.R. 4158, which would have given the attorney general the authority to appoint the agents who protected the president, instead of the Secret Service. Rowley, the agency’s chief, acknowledged in his testimony before the Warren Commission that he was adamantly opposed to the bill, asserting that the transfer of authority to RFK’s office would ‘confuse and be a conflict in jurisdiction.’”

Stripped of the task of protecting the president, the Secret Service would have lost budget, and, every bit as importantly, face and clout, not, you understand, with the mere politicians they guarded, or the public they purported to serve also, but with real power: and real power would have lost what was arguably its most important institutional cloak, under which cover Nixon was assisted to destruction, Reagan nearly eliminated, and the anti-Clinton campaign furthered.

On the eve of Dallas, the Secret Service, like the CIA, was fighting to preserve its real raison d’etre.

Greer was doubtless chosen for reason the first; because he was a man who obeyed orders; and possessed both the requisite temperament and skill-set to fulfil the task assigned him.

There, all very logical and rational - and light years away from baseless supposition.

Paul
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Discrediting Secret Service complicity in the elimination of JFK… - by Paul Rigby - 15-07-2009, 06:55 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  NATO's Secret Armies, Gladio and JFK Jim DiEugenio 3 3,211 20-07-2019, 01:14 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Brainwashed : The Secret CIA Experiments in Canada John Kowalski 0 6,969 18-12-2017, 04:02 AM
Last Post: John Kowalski
  The Significance of the Still Secret - Secret Service Threat Sheets Peter Lemkin 0 3,526 30-04-2017, 08:07 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  The Selectice Service card photo Drew Phipps 26 22,829 08-08-2016, 05:37 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  New breaches revealed in report that says Secret Service is ‘in crisis’ Richard Coleman 1 3,187 03-12-2015, 05:55 PM
Last Post: Richard Coleman
  Secret Service agent theory comes back every year, zombie-like Tracy Riddle 5 4,923 30-11-2015, 05:26 PM
Last Post: Tracy Riddle
  Secret Service Officer Arrested For Burglary With Handgun Richard Coleman 1 2,280 12-04-2015, 05:08 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  MSM shocked about Secret Service Tracy Riddle 3 3,278 13-03-2015, 02:23 PM
Last Post: Tracy Riddle
  Mind Boggling: Secret Service breakdown or worse... Richard Coleman 22 10,134 03-10-2014, 11:10 AM
Last Post: Martin White
  Bill Simpich's State Secret is completed Alan Dale 20 23,464 20-03-2014, 03:45 AM
Last Post: Jim Hargrove

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)