Operation forty pic

[Peter Lemkin]

One last point....unless I can't read any more or am very confused by your posts, you didn't say it was Gonzalez, you said it was Droller/Bender!...making your view of who you believe it is ever more 'murky'.

I now understand why the research community can not get their facts straight or at the very least it's the few researchers that don't read carefully, just a min. ago you were addressing Seymour, Hopsicker says it's Seymour, you simply are posting information that I already know is incorrect so I AGAIN said it's Gonzalez, now, the person sitting directly in-front of Sturgis with the GLASSES on his face is Bender! Got it? Get it? Good!

Oh, and BTW! it's NOT my view, it's a fact!

Nothing you or anyone else states here on any subject is 'fact' unless backed up by significant [and presented] documents, evidence, verified interviews, etc. (and even then, subject to consensual agreement and challenge with new information or evidence that the basis for that presumed 'fact' is not valid). All else are viewpoints held by one person, or group of persons. By the way, are you aware that you have had, throughout your stay here on this Forum, presented a very combative style of posting - bordering on violating the rules? Many believe your style has been to provoke, as often as to shed light; to provoke, then withdraw...then provoke/attack others on the Forum - or the Forum itself, repeatedly. This will get you nothing but winding up on moderation, should it continue.

If you have information you want to share - share it. If you have information you don't want to share, don't tease or provoke the Forum [or its members] with vague hints about it, nor present yourself as some unique repository of 'fact', not available to others without substantial evidence - or not possible of being challenged about your views and 'facts' (as you like to call them). Please. Engage civilly and without attacking others. If you must, you can challenge another's ideas, research, or beliefs; but not the persons themselves. These are the rules of engagement here on this Forum. If you don't respect them only you will be responsible for the consequences. Such statements as 'Got it? Get it?' [along with the personal attacks removed by moderators] are/were not civil, non-productive, nor conducive of anything but creating friction - provoking, disrupting, and causing dissension/discord. They were against the rules of the Forum, besides. Similar will not be tolerated further. I believe I am expressing the unanimous view of the moderators and founders in saying this.

N.B. You have thus far, IMO, presented no 'facts' the research community nor members can 'bank on' in this matter, merely your opinions/beliefs. If you have evidence otherwise, you are welcome to present it - civilly.