Operation forty pic

[Scott Kaiser]

If you have information you want to share - share it.

I did! But, YOU refuse to accept it!

don't tease or provoke the Forum [or its members]

I'm not, I have SHARED my information, but YOU continue to believe what you're told!

nor present yourself as some unique repository of 'fact', not available to others without substantial evidence

I have! No one has ever communicated with as many anti-Castro Cubans in Miami as I have to date, simply no one!

or not possible of being challenged about your views and 'facts' (as you like to call them).

I want you to challenge me that way you'll learn something if you just open your mind and understand what it is I have already accomplished to date.

Engage civilly and without attacking others.

Could you please give me one example of my attacking and whom I have attacked? Thank you!

If you don't respect them only you will be responsible for the consequences. Such statements as 'Got it? Get it?'

I apologize if I hurt your feelings, but referring to Got it? or Get it? is after all in a manner that is responsive to your statement. You said.

One last point....unless I can't read any more or am very confused by your posts, you didn't say it was Gonzalez, you said it was Droller/Bender!...making your view of who you believe it is ever more 'murky'.

I don't believe for one min. my response was "out of line" I was simply trying to get you to [understand].

[along with the personal attacks removed by moderators]

You keep saying that, but I don't understand what you're talking about, can you please give me an example? Thank you!

You have thus far, IMO, presented no 'facts' the research community nor members can 'bank on' in this matter, merely your opinions/beliefs. If you have evidence otherwise, you are welcome to present it - civilly.

But, you say,

To my knowledge, there are NO publicly available documents about who is in the photo - but surely the CIA and FBI [possibly others] have detailed analysis/documents of the photo and the meeting it represents. At one time, after it emerged, when I was [U]sure[/U] it was Tosh [hiding his face], he was denying it. More recently, he has admitted it to Dawn, myself, and others in emails and elsewhere. I said elsewhere that he certainly could tell you everyone in the photo [and the reason for the celebration/meeting], but he has refused to tell me anything more than where and when - but that is buried somewhere in many emails and I'm not in the mood to try to locate it just now. I'd suggest you, Scott, ask Tosh to name the persons. Some are obvious and there is no doubt. A few are. To my memory, Tosh never said he was 'part' of Op-40, but he often said he was associated with/supporting it [or persons/ops within it]. You'd have to ask him the subtle difference[s].

Now that is excellent research folks!

You just keep setting up the pins Doc! And, I'll keep knocking them down!