10-07-2014, 04:19 PM
Tom Bowden Wrote:Nothing like a good disagreement between people especially concerning three dimensional objects taken with a two dimensional view. I am amazed by people measuring objects in photographs and expecting accurate results, even those with something to compare directly. Any tilt of the head in the third plane and change in lighting affects the results in photographic comparisons. I prefer to have the subject state if it is him and then try to ascertain if he is telling the truth.
This has been the best post ever! When I read.
Quote:I compared, with my pixel counting software, the operation 40 pic with images of Plumlee and Sturgis. Mathematically the part of the face more closely matches Plumlee.
I damned near fell out of my chair laughing so hard, here, let me let you all in on another secret. When I was at Felix's house I asked him without showing him the photo because I didn't have it on me at the time, "who's the person covering his face with his coat jacket in the photo?" He really didn't want to talk about it and said the people in that photo were all drug dealers, I ask him so what does that have to do with the photo?
After awhile I left it alone as he was showing me Che's watch, I later said, you know it sure looks like someone my father knew and that's the only reason why I really wanted to know from him who it was. Now, before I submit my answer, anyone who has heard my conversation with Tosh would think my father knew both Sturgis and Tosh, but Felix told me it was Sturgis, sometime ago Gordon Winslow sent me the photo with numbers attached to each man asking me to identify the men, this was before I went to Miami and talked to other individuals who knows the men in this photo, so, before I left to Miami, I sent this photo to Felix in an email, when I sent that photo to Felix that is when he got pissed because he doesn't want people to know "HE" is in it.