16-07-2014, 01:35 PM
Why don't we wait and see what IAI actually says before we assume that there's been some sort of covert op to alter their records?
Let's just use Occam's Razor here for a sec; what's more likely, that a person (unknown to her) is lying to Joan Mellen, or that the CIA staged a Watergate to plant a "note" in an IAI file to lead people away from a suspect that you guys all believe is a red herring, or a cover up, to begin with?
Let's just use Occam's Razor here for a sec; what's more likely, that a person (unknown to her) is lying to Joan Mellen, or that the CIA staged a Watergate to plant a "note" in an IAI file to lead people away from a suspect that you guys all believe is a red herring, or a cover up, to begin with?
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."