30-07-2014, 04:02 PM
Thanks again to all for the informative follow-up posts.
The evidence as a whole seems to show, at minimum, that:
There are some real similarities here between the USG's treatment of Ruby
and Oswald. Consider this sworn testimony before the ARRB from Robert
Tanenbaum, who served as Chief Counsel to the HSCA's subcommittee on
the Assassination of JFK:
But with respect to the investigation, the executive committee transfer (sic, should be "transcript") for example of approximately January 20th, 23rd, 27th, in that period of time when the Attorney General of Texas, Henry Wade the District Attorney and Leon Jaworsky counsel to the Attorney General, on the transcript spoke to the Chief Justice and said in substance, as I recall, that they had information from unimpeachable sources that Lee Harvey Oswald was a contract employee of the CIA and the FBI. And the Chief Justice said well we'll investigate that. And yet in substance on the record Allen Dulles says not so fast. What do you mean says the Chief Justice, to which Allen Dulles replies, well if you ask J. Edgar Hoover whether or not Oswald was an employee of the FBI he's simply going to say, no. To which the Chief Justice responded, do you mean to tell me if I were to call an agent in here under oath he would not tell the truth? And Dulles said, if he were a good agent. The Chief Justice said, well, who will he tell the truth to? And Dulles replied, maybe the President.
And... maybe not. Thanks again!
The evidence as a whole seems to show, at minimum, that:
1. Ruby worked with Rep. Richard Nixon's staff as far back as 1947.
2. He had a U.S. Security Clearance, at least in 1961, allowing
him aboard flights demonstrating ground terrain hugging
flight instrumentation with clear Intelligence benefits.
3. Although there are numerous, credible reports linking Ruby
to the illegal Cuban armaments trade, he was apparently protected
from arrest and prosecution.
4. He had insider's knowledge of at least some aspects of the
Oswald saga, at least once correcting Dallas DA Henry Wade.
5. He silenced Oswald for no apparent reason whatsoever.
6. The U.S. government stonewalled his true biography during
four investigations, just like it did for "Oswald."
2. He had a U.S. Security Clearance, at least in 1961, allowing
him aboard flights demonstrating ground terrain hugging
flight instrumentation with clear Intelligence benefits.
3. Although there are numerous, credible reports linking Ruby
to the illegal Cuban armaments trade, he was apparently protected
from arrest and prosecution.
4. He had insider's knowledge of at least some aspects of the
Oswald saga, at least once correcting Dallas DA Henry Wade.
5. He silenced Oswald for no apparent reason whatsoever.
6. The U.S. government stonewalled his true biography during
four investigations, just like it did for "Oswald."
There are some real similarities here between the USG's treatment of Ruby
and Oswald. Consider this sworn testimony before the ARRB from Robert
Tanenbaum, who served as Chief Counsel to the HSCA's subcommittee on
the Assassination of JFK:
But with respect to the investigation, the executive committee transfer (sic, should be "transcript") for example of approximately January 20th, 23rd, 27th, in that period of time when the Attorney General of Texas, Henry Wade the District Attorney and Leon Jaworsky counsel to the Attorney General, on the transcript spoke to the Chief Justice and said in substance, as I recall, that they had information from unimpeachable sources that Lee Harvey Oswald was a contract employee of the CIA and the FBI. And the Chief Justice said well we'll investigate that. And yet in substance on the record Allen Dulles says not so fast. What do you mean says the Chief Justice, to which Allen Dulles replies, well if you ask J. Edgar Hoover whether or not Oswald was an employee of the FBI he's simply going to say, no. To which the Chief Justice responded, do you mean to tell me if I were to call an agent in here under oath he would not tell the truth? And Dulles said, if he were a good agent. The Chief Justice said, well, who will he tell the truth to? And Dulles replied, maybe the President.
And... maybe not. Thanks again!