Inexplicable Wounds made by Special Bullets

[Bob Prudhomme]

As I said earlier, the ballistic and forensic evidence in this case isn't reliable enough to be able to draw any definite conclusions about the type of weapons used. It took me many years to realize that.

Hi Tracy

What evidence in this case is reliable enough to be able to draw any definite conclusions?

While definite conclusions may not be possible we can, however, rule out the impossible. For example, look at the SBT. No matter how hard Dale Myers tries, he cannot get around the basic medical fact that you cannot get a bullet through JFK's neck, from Point A to Point B, without encountering a couple of large vertebrae along the way. The necessary minimum lateral angle, measured from the centre line of the limo, of 23° does not jive with the SN being only 9° laterally removed from the centre line of the limo, and the extreme angle of 23° would necessitate Connally being on the opposite side of the limo, in order to be hit in the right armpit by the SBT bullet.

As you say, though, without reliable ballistic and forensic evidence, we cannot draw any definite conclusions about the SBT, and Dale Myers is allowed to go on thrilling the sheeple with his cartoon; impossible as it is.

I am looking at the evidence we do have, forensic, medical and ballistic, and attempting to find similarities and patterns that will point to a particular type of bullet, cartridge and rifle. JFK's and Connally's wounds are very strange, if we accept even a portion of what we are told about them as true, and their very nature rules out most common types of bullets. However, I will never be able to give you a definite answer on what exactly caused them.