03-09-2014, 02:17 AM
Albert Doyle Wrote:Anthony DeFiore Wrote:Far be it from me or the article to try and give better details on the assassination than "The Mastermind"-Phil Nelson,
Good thing Charles isn't here any more.
Mexico and the doubles shows things that were beyond LBJ's abilities. Therefore there's evidence of CIA involvement. Realizing CIA was a vastly bigger entity than LBJ with vastly bigger motives it stands to reason that LBJ can't be referred to as the source of the assassination.
This is an example of why the Sponsor(Mastermind)/Facilitator/Mechanic model is so handy. At most, LBJ could only be a facilitator, given the number of aspects of the assassination that had to be brought into coordination.
But Charlie beat people over the head with the model, including his fellow moderators.
I think the LBJ did it POV is bad research and/or disinformation.
Drew brings up the problem of "character evidence" quite nicely. Leaving out the very problematic Madeline Brown, there is nothing more to implicate LBJ.
"We'll know our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the American public believes is false." --William J. Casey, D.C.I
"We will lead every revolution against us." --Theodore Herzl
"We will lead every revolution against us." --Theodore Herzl