05-09-2014, 03:56 AM
Bob Prudhomme Wrote:Herbert Blenner Wrote:Bob Prudhomme Wrote:Herbert Blenner Wrote:The description of the throat wound by members of the Forensic Pathology Panel who studied a stereoscopic pair of photographs trumps the observations of the Parkland doctors.
Source: Report of the Forensic Pathology Panel - 7HSCA, 93
(262) There is a semicircular missile defect near the center of the lower margin of the tracheotomy incision, approximately in the midline of the neck, with margins which are slightly denuded and reddish-brown.
This same panel twice cited denuded and discolored margins to explain how entering bullets made the small scalp wound and the transverse back wound.
http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/h..._0057b.htm
http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/h..._0048b.htm
The bullet which entered the throat made the 7 mm by 4 mm longitudinal back wound which the medical panels replaced by their 7 mm by 10 mm transverse back wound.
Once again, Herbert, explain to us how this bullet made it intact through the vertebrae without smashing them. I have already demonstrated to you the impossibility of your theory of the bullet passing between the transverse processes of two adjacent vertebrae.
Regardless of whether the bullet entered the throat and exited the back or entered the back and exited the throat, the spinal column presented the same obstacle in the same position relative to the wound track. For this reason you raise an absurd objection to the entry wound of the throat.
Herbert
Yes, the spinal column presented the same obstacle no matter if the bullet was coming or going. THAT IS WHY NEITHER SCENARIO EVER HAPPENED, HERBERT. CAN YOU GET THAT THROUGH YOUR THICK F*CKING HEAD AND QUIT CLUTTERING MY THREADS UP WITH YOUR NONSENSE??????
Where in the world did you get the impression that I believed Humes or Boswell? Instead, I properly interpret the medical evidence as presented.
Now who hell do you think you are talking down, mister? I suggest that you get off your high horse before you fall and hurt yourself. On second thought ignore my last sentence.