Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Can't find diagram of shots to jfk from conspiracy point of view?
#44
Drew Phipps Wrote:What I am suggesting is, if the bullet passed thru the head from front to back and exited to the back, it carried away some of its kinetic energy, and could not have transferred 100% of its momentum to the head. The motion of the head backward contains more energy than can be added by one bullet (even at 100%).

For the head to move backward so fast, something else must also have occurred.

There is an easy way to explain how what we see for movement in the Zapruder is physically impossible. You can start with Ken Rahn's mathematical analysis of the JFK movements seen in the Zapruder film. I have pointed out previously that Ken made one huge assumption:

Assumes that the Z-film is genuine
Obviously, this work assumes that the Zapruder film is genuine. It is ludicrous to think that it is anything else. Thompson has effectively destroyed the myth of alteration in a brilliant essay that is posted here.

And here is one of his problems:

Low mass of head
There may be a conflict between the lighter heads that these calculations support (57 lb) and the classical heads that are usually quoted (more like 10 lb, or even 15). Does this mean there is something wrong with these calculations? Not necessarily

http://www.kenrahn.com/JFK/Scientific_topics/Physics_of_head_shot/38-Objections.html

So Ken with his in depth mathematical review of the movements we see in the Zapruder film finds that for those movements to be possible that JFK's head must be lighter than any classical heads!!!!!!!!!

To resolve this problem, Ken does what Vince Bugliosi and many others do when faced with explaining a conflict with the big lie, he proposes a ridiculous assumption to fix the problem, JFK's head must be lighter than what the literature shows a normal head weighs. Yea, that's it, JFK's head was lighter than everyone else's! If you wade through this mess, Ken goes on to state that the shot from behind is possible with what we see in the Zapruder film but it is not possible that he was shot from the front.! See, the US government was right after all even though he had to make the ridiculous assumption that JFK's head weighed about one half of what we would expect it to weigh classically. Wake up. JFK's head did not weigh only 5-7 pounds!

And then the JFK crowd quotes Ken as saying that the shot works from behind but it is impossible the shot was fired from in front.

In other words, Ken showed JFK's head movement we see in the Z film proves the Zapruder film is forged because it had to assume JFK's head had to be lighter than possible. Duhhhhhhhhh!
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Can't find diagram of shots to jfk from conspiracy point of view? - by William Charleston - 06-09-2014, 09:36 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  New Alt.Conspiracy.JFK Google Group Brian Doyle 0 457 21-11-2023, 04:47 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Thomas Kelley reports Oswald said he did not view parade Richard Gilbride 1 593 26-09-2023, 04:31 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  DiEugenio Betrays Conspiracy Research Brian Doyle 1 700 07-07-2023, 04:32 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  The Conspiracy to Kill Lee Harvey Oswald --- Conclusion Gil Jesus 1 866 01-04-2023, 04:23 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  The Conspiracy to Kill Lee Harvey Oswald --- Part IV Gil Jesus 0 644 26-03-2023, 02:10 PM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  The Conspiracy to Kill Lee Harvey Oswald --- Part III Gil Jesus 0 691 15-03-2023, 11:34 AM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  The Conspiracy to Kill Lee Harvey Oswald Pt. 1 & 2 Gil Jesus 0 648 08-03-2023, 01:28 PM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  JFK Conspiracy for Younger Generations Cliff Varnell 1 2,872 02-06-2019, 11:17 AM
Last Post: Cliff Varnell
  JFK and Far Right Conspiracy Rhetoric Jim DiEugenio 4 9,314 02-01-2019, 06:14 AM
Last Post: Scott Kaiser
  rootclaim - Estimating the Probability of Conspiracy vs. LHO Acted Alone Bill Fite 11 10,375 29-04-2018, 05:08 PM
Last Post: Phil Dagosto

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)