07-09-2014, 02:43 PM
Drew Phipps Wrote:Seems very unlikely to me that a separate bullet that transited merely the wrist would impart more of a momentum change in Conally's torso than even a whole bullet thru the chest could have possibly imparted. What you are trying to suggest sounds like handball players who are knocked backwards while playing because of the contact between the hand and the ball.
I am not trying to suggest anything, I am stating that:
1. The time between shots in the Zapruder film matches the times between shots in the latest analysis of the acoustical evidence. That proves statistically that the acoustical evidence is valid.
2. Knowing when shots were fired by using BOTH the Z film and the acoustical evidence produces a unique scenario because just like any other "theory". In the acoustical analysis scenario, you have some chance of knowing where EACH of the shots was fired from because the analysis using echo correlation has to know approximately where each shot was fired from AND where the microphone was.
John Connally at Z224 starts his first reaction to a shot. That is 4.8 seconds BEFORE JFK is shot in the head which is when the acoustical analysis indicates the 2nd shot was fired from the TSBD. John Connally then snaps to the left then begins his turn to the right to look where he thought the shot came from. John Connally was not wounded at this point in the back, he only had a trivial left thigh wound caused by a bullet fragment, not a bullet. John Connally has no blood on his shirt that can be seen from Z224 all the way to JFK's head shot, NONE.
The Z313 shot from the left front and the last shot from the TSBD were 0.7 seconds apart. The Z 313 shot knocked JFK's head out of the way, the last shot from the TSBD missed JFK' s head and at Z325, we see John Connally violently thrown forward when TSBD shot #3 hits him in the back, exits his chest, hits his right wrist. Connally's right wrist is higher than it was earlier.
This scenario explains many things the SBT and other guesses/lies can't:
Nellie and John said he turned after JFK was first wounded. He turned to the right and was turning back to look over his left shoulder when he was bent over by the force of the bullet to his back.
It is hard to comprehend that John Connally could turn to look over his right shoulder with an exit wound in his chest about the size of a baseball. Bugliosi and others argue it is possible. OK, but is it reasonable Connally turned with a serious chest wound from Z224 until Z325? The answer is it is not reasonable but people believe it only because the government "investigations" said it happened. Some of them lied and some of them were conned into buying into the biggest lie in history.
The chest wound and right wrist wound to Connally are reasonably matched but the left thigh wound is not. It was caused by a bullet fragment.
CE399 found on a stretcher had to have been planted. It was not found on neither JFK's or Connally's stretcher according to the orderly who found CE399. But the Warren Comm. chose to believe the orderly was mistaken just like they chose not to believe the press reporter who said he talked with Jack Ruby at Parkland Hospital (which makes Jack Ruby a very likely suspect to have planted CE399). The Warren Comm. didn't believe the reporter either.
For that matter, the Warren Comm chose not to believe the Connally's when they described his turn after JFK was first wounded. But the Connally's also said that John Connally was wounded in the back and then JFK was shot in the head but if you look at the Z film, Connally was facing forward when JFK was shot in the head, he did NOT see JFK wounded and therefore did know the time JFK was wounded. The goverment interegators argued with both of the Connally's. i believe they coerced the witnesses to saying JFK was shot in the head after Connally was shot in the back.
How did they hide the Connally back wound time so long?
ANSWER: Ever JFK researcher bought the lie that Connally to be close to the TSBD when the shot hit him in the back because the angle had to be down to allow the bullet to hit his left thigh. With that constraint, nobody believed it was possible for Connally to have been shot in the back much later than Z230 or so......
It's easy to fool Americans, all you have to is fool the press. Those who disagree will be called conspiracy theorists and other demeaning terms. We can't know the truth until the media and the government tells us the answers, until then, shut up.
To figure out what happened, you must question everything the US government provided as evidence and conclusions from their "investigations." Only use evidence the US government could not have forged and the scenario you come up with will mostly be consistent with what the witnesses said happened. At that point, you can see US government lies everywhere as you compare the correct shooting scenario with the US government fairy tales and lies.