Can't find diagram of shots to jfk from conspiracy point of view?

[William Charleston]

a. I don't believe that disproving the audio analysis of the HSCA is the same as proving the Lone Nut theory. Just because a talking head says something on TV, doesn't make it so.

b. Meyers gives McClain 1/2 sec to travel 175 feet. Don Thomas (whose work published in Mary Ferrell you have liberally borrowed from) puts the time at 4 seconds, which requires HB McClain to accelerate to 30 mph for no apparent reason other than to position his microphone appropriately. Even giving your time frame its most liberal construction, giving McClain 7 seconds to cover the ground suggests a speed of 18 mph. The motorcade was making an average speed of 9-10 mph, sometimes slower as they rounded the completely-against-Secret-Service-policy sharp left turn at Elm. Now, both 30 and 18 mph are well within the capability of the motorcycle, but the question remains: Why on earth would Officer McClain abandon his post and move ahead of his assigned position prior to any shots being fired?

c. McClain, after listening to the recording, denied that it came from his position.

d. There are other noises on the audio inconsistent with the time frame of the assassination.

e. A statistical correlation doesn't prove a causation event (i.e. the relationship between gunshots and "sound impulse" on the audio tape.

From wiki:
"The cum hoc ergo propter hoc logical fallacy can be expressed as follows:

1. A occurs in correlation with B.
   
2. Therefore, A causes B.
   

In this type of logical fallacy, one makes a premature conclusion about causality after observing only a correlation between two or more factors. Generally, if one factor (A) is observed to only be correlated with another factor (B), it is sometimes taken for granted that A is causing B, even when no evidence supports it. This is a logical fallacy because there are at least five possibilities:

1. A may be the cause of B.
   
2. B may be the cause of A.
   
3. some unknown third factor C may actually be the cause of both A and B.
   
4. there may be a combination of the above three relationships. For example, B may be the cause of A at the same time as A is the cause of B (contradicting that the only relationship between A and B is that A causes B). This describes a self-reinforcing system.
   
5. the "relationship" is a coincidence or so complex or indirect that it is more effectively called a coincidence (i.e. two events occurring at the same time that have no direct relationship to each other besides the fact that they are occurring at the same time). A larger sample size helps to reduce the chance of a coincidence, unless there is a systematic error in the experiment.
   

In other words, there can be no conclusion made regarding the existence or the direction of a cause-and-effect relationship only from the fact that A and B are correlated. Determining whether there is an actual cause-and-effect relationship requires further investigation, even when the relationship between A and B is statistically significant, a large effect size is observed, or a large part of the variance is explained."

(bold emphasis added)

Generally, if [B]one factor (A) is observed to only be correlated with another factor (B), it is sometimes taken for granted that A is causing B, even when no evidence supports it. This is a logical fallacy because there are at least five possibilities[/B]

IF the acoustical analysis is valid (in other words, the sounds of the shots were recorded on the Dallas Police radio recording):

1. The time between shots would be the same in both the Zapruder film and the acoustical recording.



Shot #1 Z178 Rosemary Willis stops running less than one second after 1st shot from TSBD. Shot ricochet slightly wounded James Tague.

Shot #2 Z202 fired from left front. It passed through the windshield just to the left of the rear view mirror and hit JFK in the neck and exited near the base of his neck.

Shot #3 Z224 Second shot from TSBD. CE840 (three bullet fragments found under Nellie's seat) suggest the second shot fired from the TSBD hit a branch and fragmented. Witnesses about this time report seeing something hit the pavement. JFK had a back wound about 5.5 inches below his collar. It was stated during the autopsy that the back wound was shallow and it had no point of exit which is consistent with a bullet fragment, not a bullet. Dr. Shaw, one of Connally's doctors said the wound to his left thigh was caused by a bullet fragment, not a bullet.

Shot #4 was fired from the grassy knoll per the acoustical analysis. Per Secret Service agent Roy Kellerman's Warren Commission testimony, there was a small entrance wound in the hairline just forward of his right ear and a massive wound in the right rear of his head where the skull was blown out. Of significance, Roy Kellerman's description of the exit wound matches the descriptions given by medical personnel at Parkland Hospital. No witness at Parkland matches what the autopsy or the Zapruder film shows.

Shot #5 (shot #3 from TSBD) fired a split second after JFK's head shot missed JFK's head and hit John Connally in the back.

In other words the acoustical evidence bang-bang scenario is consistent with what we see in the Zapruder film AND what some witnesses tell us happened. We now know due to Doug Horne's work that the Zapruder film was forged on the Sunday after the assassination but it only hid some of the things the conspirators did not want us to see, it was hastily done.

2. John Connally's turn to look over his right shoulder after Z224: Connally said he heard what he thought was a shot and he turned toward it as we see from Z230-300.

3. John Connally said the force of the bullet to his back bent him over which is exactly what is seen a split second after JFK was shot in the head.



Some have said Connally just fell over a split second after JFK was shot in the head but it is clear, Nellie Connally could not have thrown John Connally forward and then pulled him over. It looks like Connally's description was correct, the force of the bullet to his back bent him over.

4. John Connally has no blood on his shirt nor does he show any characteristics of a man who has a hole in his chest the size of a baseball after Z224. This suggests John Connally was right, he was not shot in the back until he was bent over.

5. The force of the bullet: The acoustical evidence gives "suggestion" of the timing of the shots and the origin of the shots. The bullet to JFK's head and the bullet to Connally's back knocked the men directly away from the gunman. You no longer have to listen to those who believe the Laws of Conservation of Momentum and Energy do not apply to Dealey Plaza.

6. The acoustical evidence shows the last two shots were bang-bang. If true, a significant number of people would have heard BANG-BANG; they did and Charnin fails to identify all of them who said that is what they heard. There are more people who said the last two shots were fired BANG-BANG.

http://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2014...een-shots/



And then there was BAM-BAM.

ETC. ETC. ETC.

The acoustical evidence with the last two shots fired BANG-BANG explains many of the mysteries of the JFK assassination. It suggests, for example, a powerful conspiracy in the US government forged evidence. How could it be possible that a reasonable scenario of BANG-BANG, JFK's head shot and then Connally's back is not published anywhere except by me?

The brainwashing of Americans has been much more effective than I would have ever believed. My job is to introduce some to the information needed to solve the case. You and others are not going to believe me, you have to prove it to yourself that there is sufficient information to prove that we were lied to about what happened when JFK was brutally murdered.