16-09-2014, 08:26 PM
William Charleston Wrote:How could it be possible that a reasonable scenario of BANG-BANG, JFK's head shot and then Connally's back is not published anywhere except by me?
I'm not arguing that your scenario is unreasonable. I'm arguing that the acoustic evidence isn't taken seriously by researchers for the very good reasons cited above. In addition, I'm (as of about a week ago) no longer willing to believe that the Zapruder film is necesarily an accurate recording of the assassination (there are other recent threads concerning this issue on this forum). Since your work involves comparing the acoustic evidence, to the Zapruder film, you are depending on the validity of them both.
What's left is comparing witness recollections, common sense, and the physics of momentum.
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."