07-11-2014, 05:17 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-11-2014, 07:38 PM by Albert Doyle.)
Too many mainstream researchers quit too early on persons of controversy. There's an either/or, total discrediting syndrome where once a person gets tarred with lack of credibility they get dumped. Baker is probably begging for it but she has too many positive hits, like Anna Lewis, to completely dismiss her.
I think the reason good researchers get sucked in is because of those positive aspects. These kind of cases really require a brain surgery level approach because they get down to the delicate level. It is possible JVB was originally assigned from the covert side and not from any innocent whistleblower side. If true then she was monitoring Oswald rather than the other way around and this kind of flooding the situation with bizarre garbage claims that have some basis in truth is typical of spook ops designed to muddy the waters and draw contempt on conspiracy claims. To completely throw out JVB's story is to risk ignoring Mrs Lewis's claim that she first met Oswald in Feb-Apr 1962, which would be months before the false defector Oswald returned from Russia. This would be very good evidence of there being two Oswalds.
While espionage was a man's game back then, the use of women for important spy work is as old as history. Mata Hari was one example going back to WWI when Allen Dulles got his start.
By the way, there are sand beaches not too far from New Orleans.
Anna Lewis seems to have a New Orleans background that can't be dismissed that easily. She also doesn't appear to be lying to me.
.
I think the reason good researchers get sucked in is because of those positive aspects. These kind of cases really require a brain surgery level approach because they get down to the delicate level. It is possible JVB was originally assigned from the covert side and not from any innocent whistleblower side. If true then she was monitoring Oswald rather than the other way around and this kind of flooding the situation with bizarre garbage claims that have some basis in truth is typical of spook ops designed to muddy the waters and draw contempt on conspiracy claims. To completely throw out JVB's story is to risk ignoring Mrs Lewis's claim that she first met Oswald in Feb-Apr 1962, which would be months before the false defector Oswald returned from Russia. This would be very good evidence of there being two Oswalds.
While espionage was a man's game back then, the use of women for important spy work is as old as history. Mata Hari was one example going back to WWI when Allen Dulles got his start.
By the way, there are sand beaches not too far from New Orleans.
Quote:The idea that if you get one person to vouch for you, then somehow that gives you ballast, that simply does not wash. Because Slatzer did this with his phony Marilyn MOnroe story and Summers fell for it. Turned out that he gave someone three hundred bucks to back up his fairy tale.
Anna Lewis seems to have a New Orleans background that can't be dismissed that easily. She also doesn't appear to be lying to me.
.