06-11-2008, 07:23 PM
Paul Rigby Wrote:[quote=Dawn Meredith]
Sure Jim, via Dawn, here:
http://www.ctka.net/bbc_rfk.html
BBC RFK Update
by James DiEugenio
June 2007
The line has baffled me since I read it: All the CIA "liberals" spent late 1967-early 1968 getting "Clean for Gene"!
Paul
Paul: More from Jim below:
Dawn:
Thanks for posting my question to Rigby.
That quote he uses does not mean what he takes it to mean. In the
context I stated it I was trying to figure out the Ayers/Rabern/
O'Sullivan theory of why Rabern was at the Ambassador that night.,
since he would not reveal his real reason for being there, if he was.
O'Sullivan never explained it. Neither did Rabern. Neither did Ayers.
So I was only throwing that out as a guess as to why he was there. I
actually did not really believe that was the reason. Now that the
other part of O'Sullivan's thesis has fallen-Morales, Campbell and
Johannides were likely not there--then Rabern's excuse is pretty much
non existent. Which is what I actually thought all along-- if he was
there at all.
Also, can you tell Rigby that the version of Tim Tate's RFK special he
is referring to is the Americanized one shown on cable TV. The one I
refer to in my essay is the original British version which is about
35 minutes longer and even better.
Well, let's hope Obama is the real thing.
JIM D