Sean Murphy's research deserves more

[Bob Prudhomme]

Is it possible Fritz's notes were written during the Oswald interrogation but Fritz had to say they were written later in order not to expose evidence suppression orders?

Not likely. In fact, I once again am having difficulty even comprehending what you are talking about.

I would think that notes taken during the interrogation would make it seem there were no "evidence suppression orders", whatever they are.

Bob, those are the same notes that disappeared with DPD saying they never took them. Do you believe DPD never took any notes on the most important suspect in their history? You are assuring us this did not constitute evidence suppression?


I'm still waiting for an answer to whether or not someone instructed Baker to include the window in the lunch-room door and who exactly that was if Baker never entered? Or told him to fabricate a man on the 4th floor landing? Since you are saying Baker fabricated this report how could that not be evidence of falsification? And since you yourself are saying Baker falsified evidence then why couldn't Fritz have misrepresented the notes?

From the Warren Commission testimony of J.W. Fritz, 1964:

"Mr. BALL. Do you remember what you said to Oswald and what he said to you?
Mr. FRITZ. I can remember the thing that I said to him and what he said to me, but I will have trouble telling you which period of questioning those questions were in because I kept no notes at the time, and these notes and things that I have made I would have to make several days later, and the questions may be in the wrong place."

Can you think of one logical reason why Fritz would be telling a lie here about not taking notes at the time of the interrogation?