16-04-2015, 04:41 AM
Bob Prudhomme Wrote:And let's see, your doubt of no notes being taken is PROOF of subversion of evidence....hmmm. Weird.
Not at all weird. Frankly Bob I don't see where you've earned the tone you seem to assume in your inquiry.
I find it unlikely that the Dallas police would interrogate a presidential assassin and the most important suspect they ever had and take no notes.
Weird is looking at the already recognized massive amount of subversion of evidence in this case while mocking the suggestion of subversion of evidence.
It's no different than your suggestion that no mention of Oswald being Prayer Man is proof of intimidation.