The Fiasco of Spartacus

[Vanessa Loney]

Anyone who tries to get away with saying Oswald's Driver's License was an application is a troll. I remember the paper card type license I first got when I learned to drive. I think there was a temporary permit paper card they issued while you were learning to drive, but that was only for a few months at best so I doubt it would have turned brown from wear or being in a wallet. There was never any "application" card that you carried like a paper driver's license. Parker simply isn't credible on this and is being allowed to get away with bogus excuses he himself would never allow others to get away with. He's dodging recognizing that the Texas Safety and Highway Department employees were trained to notice the difference and would never have made such a basic mistake. Parker is also ignoring the many witnessings of driving Oswald's including Mr Chester at the garage, the many witnesses in Alice Texas, Mrs Whitworth and Mrs Hunter, and many more. I doubt those Oswald's were winging it in Texas with no license. But Parker doesn't have to worry about this because he just denies them all and says you don't have proof. A very Lone Nut tactic.

The only reason Parker is saying it is an application card is because he's trying to make it fit his bogus Bogard scenario where Oswald, who only made peanuts, was going to buy a brand new car in order to take a driver's test when he could have just borrowed Mrs Paine's. These theories are obviously laughable and would get anyone else laughed out of the room, yet Parker regularly gets away with them. Also Parker contradicts the real witness, Bogard, and corrects him telling him he was wrong about which date it occurred. Once again the motive here is for Parker to make the facts fit his theory. Except Bogard says he remembers it was the 9th because that was the day he had to go out of town. Parker ignores this, gives no answer to it, and gets away with it with nobody calling him on it. The Wayne January Oswald and Oswald who left his wallet and wedding ring was not any Oswald who intended to come back and buy a car in order to domesticate with Marina. Parker is the worst violator of his own rules because his need to deny is so strong.

You're not answering the point Vanessa, which is the real site rules violation here. Your proxy trolling for Parker doesn't relieve you of having to do that.


.

Thanks Brian - but this thread is actually "The Fiasco of Spartacus" which probably comes down to a matter of personal opinion on both sides rather than facts. There's plenty of other threads for discussing the facts on Armstrong and H&L etc. And I would invite all those interested to take their arguments there.

This thread was established to discuss the 'fiasco' at EF and includes a discussion on the Armstrong debate at EF (and also contains quite a few personal attacks which I would have thought violated DP's rules).

All I am suggesting is that the Armstrong discussion can be resolved in a more productive way than the current method. But strangely I'm not finding any supporters for that debate on here. Can you tell me why?

Brian, you still haven't addressed the issue of why you are using your father's name instead of your own.