19-06-2015, 03:03 PM
(This post was last modified: 19-06-2015, 03:38 PM by Albert Doyle.)
Yes, he says it was actually Oswald and that he was trying out a Mercury Comet Caliente in order to buy a brand new expensive car - now get this, in order to take a driver's test. Yes, Greg is saying that straight-faced and saying everyone else got it wrong and is some kind of Oswald doppleganger nut. And Parker is also correcting Bogard and saying it happened on the 16th because Oswald was seen with Marina on the 9th. The problem is Bogard told the Commission he gave a rushed test drive because he was going out of town that day on the 9th. A coincidence that would make it very unlikely it was the 16th. This doesn't matter to Parker because once called on it he ignores you and enters a deliberately designed overload of sophist bullshit intended to mire you in his skeptic accusations. And then EF egos take his side in order to satisfy some kind of egotistical need to become arbiters. What kind of fools would side with such an obvious ass as Parker?
I haven't seen his Odio claim but I would guess it was equally as fruity and skeptical.
Parker also presents the FBI statements on Ralph Yates straight, verbatim, and without question, never once giving heed to the fact FBI was trying to crush Yates and bury his witnessing. That is like offering the Nazi official report on the Reichstag fire straight and without question. He also says the FBI report shows Yates initiated the conversation with the hitch-hiker, except when you go in and read it it says in clear writing that the hitch-hiker initiated the conversation.
He also says the Oswald Driver's License, closely examined by 6 Texas Public Safety & Highway Department employees, was an application in order to make it fit his nutty theory that Oswald was trying to get a Driver's License during the Bogard period.
I have to correct something I wrote. FBI would not have used this alleged application to prove it was Oswald doing the test drive because this Oswald told Bogard he intended to come into a lot of money and that doesn't fit the Lone Nut strategy FBI adopted.
I haven't seen his Odio claim but I would guess it was equally as fruity and skeptical.
Parker also presents the FBI statements on Ralph Yates straight, verbatim, and without question, never once giving heed to the fact FBI was trying to crush Yates and bury his witnessing. That is like offering the Nazi official report on the Reichstag fire straight and without question. He also says the FBI report shows Yates initiated the conversation with the hitch-hiker, except when you go in and read it it says in clear writing that the hitch-hiker initiated the conversation.
He also says the Oswald Driver's License, closely examined by 6 Texas Public Safety & Highway Department employees, was an application in order to make it fit his nutty theory that Oswald was trying to get a Driver's License during the Bogard period.
I have to correct something I wrote. FBI would not have used this alleged application to prove it was Oswald doing the test drive because this Oswald told Bogard he intended to come into a lot of money and that doesn't fit the Lone Nut strategy FBI adopted.