19-06-2015, 06:41 PM
Don Jeffries Wrote:Jim DiEugenio Wrote:Greg is saying that its actually Oswald that Bogard saw?
And he is saying that Odio and her sister were wrong about Oswald or a double being at her doorstep?
Wow.
Originally, Greg claimed that Bogard interacted with an "Oswalt" who just coincidentally had a nearly identical name. Then, he had a strange epiphany and boldly declared that it was actually the real Oswald, with a very understandable scenario where he felt he had to buy a car to take his driving test.
As for Odio, Greg has danced all around this, and continues to misquote her testimony in order to claim that her visitors never used the last name "Oswald" to her. Even when it was pointed out by someone that the name "Lee" is virtually unknown in the Spanish language, and that "Leon" was its closest approximation, Greg continued to harp on that- "Why wouldn't they call him Lee?"
Basically, Greg follows the official government line that nearly every one who interacted with an Oswald impersonator (Yates, Bogard, Odio) was somehow "mentally ill" and thus not credible. Although, again, his views on Odio are confusing, as he continues to maintain she didn't lie, but didn't meet an Oswald impersonator.
As I've pointed out on the EF, virtually everything Greg posts is an attempt to dilute the case for conspiracy.
Thank you for about the millionth time Don for being the voice of reason and clarity. (On the other thread as well, gee I did not know I was being called a "very busy lawyer" over there. I never go there. I think the fact that I had 3 cases set for jury on Monday does qualify as busy however, thankfully only one is going.
I think we have to cease discussing Greg and his troops. John called me this am before court and I did not have time to talk and I just called him back and got his vm but I will ask about a debate that VL keeps pushing and report back and that will be my final comment on that issue. Having been in the critical community since 73 I have seen many fakes and became fairly good at being able to see who was for real and who was simply an agitator early on. I have zero tolerance for the bullshit. Many decent people with busy lives have devoted countless years to research and truth on all of these issues. I see that Ms. Loney did not even comment on the great interview I posted yesterday with Lisa Pease- who is smart enough to avoid forums as she too has a very busy life, working fulltime and writing a book on the RFK assassination.
Yet she types endlessly about some inside information/gossip regarding someone's alleged first name. It's abundantly clear to me she is here to
troll.
Dawn