The Fiasco of Spartacus

[Vanessa Loney]

Just spoke with John. Mainly about his new research which puts "Lee" in NY at the time "Harvey" was in Russia. I think someone has mentioned this article John's been writing on one of the threads somewhere here. He has some edits to do then will email it to me and I will post it. As to debating Parker he said he will debate "any reasonable person". But really he has no interest in debating anyone. He does research and puts it out there. If someone disagrees or does not like it, so be it. So bottom line is "no", no interest in debating Parker.
He's not afraid of Parker, just not interested. The way his work has been twisted has gotten back to him and, like me, he has no time or stomach for dishonesty. What he does enjoy is a discussion, in depth of any of his new research, which we do on a regular basis. And I did not present his book at COPA, cripes that would take a week, but his latest research on Tippit that day, 11/22/63, and the intersection of Harvey and Lee. (It's posted at his site for anyone who cares).

Dawn

Hello Dawn

Thank you for raising that with Mr Armstrong. I really do appreciate you doing that. I'm disappointed that he is not going to do a debate as I think that would clear up a lot of issues. Now we're left with the entirely unsatisfactory discussion that has been going on across the forums. But in any case, that's asked and answered and I thank you for that.

BTW I think most of the research community would say that GP accepts only evidence-based research. That makes him reasonable by any definition.