The Fiasco of Spartacus

[Vanessa Loney]

Vanessa, please spare us.

You came over here because you objected to being called a PM or Parker Minion.

But yet, you admit you never read John's book. Therefore, you are being directed by others either at ROKC or EF.

Please do not try and disguise what happened at EF.

Greg got KO'd here. So he then went over to EF with some of his own constituents in tow and started something like a Boer attack at EF--if you have seen Breaker Morant, you will know what I mean by that. I mean we all know who is from ROKC and we all know that EF has been decimated. I mean why else bring back Ray Carroll.

Now, the logical conclusion if you have not read John's book is that you got al your opinions from ROKC.

That is something I don't think anyone should do in this field. It would be like getting all your info on the autopsy from Lifton and Horne

So why should anyone respect your opinion on the subject if what you are doing is echoing or shilling for ROKC? And, IMO, dragging down EF with you?

Jim, with all due respect, (and I do respect you as a researcher but am finding your manners disappointingly lacking) I am not being directed by anyone at ROKC or EF. They would find that laughable I'm sure.

If you want to know if I actually possess any brains myself then perhaps you should read my contributions to the Prayer Man thread on EF - it's the only thread I contribute to.

I really am struggling to understand what you mean by the EF being 'decimated'. They are equal-opportunity suspenders over there so we've all had a taste of it when we step over the line.

But, if you mean the EF has been decimated because the H&L debate on there has not won over any converts and the poll over there is heavily against H&L then perhaps the problem is not with the EF but with H&L. The views that I do have on H&L have been formed solely by the EF debate.

I haven't asked anyone to respect my opinion on the subject of H&L and nor do I expect them to. I have not joined in the debate on H&L on EF or here because I have nothing to contribute to it. I am not a JFK assassination polymath such as yourself and I stick to the one field that interests me which is Prayer Man.

I have asked those that are experts on H&L to discuss it in a more constructive way rather than sniping at each other across the forums. You can all only do that by talking directly to each other on the same forum, in my view.

FWIW I find James Douglas' book to be the seminal work, so far, on the assassination. I have also enjoyed your ground-breaking work on JFK's foreign policy on CTKA and look forward to seeing that turned into a book one day.