16-04-2017, 05:39 AM
There goes Jim ignoring all the facts, accusing people who insist on those alternate possibilities being honestly recognized as having a sinister (and non-defined) agenda, and once again offering what is basically rhetoric, or even propaganda to push through Kamp's evidence-cooking.
Jim continues to stubbornly ignore that the conspiracy was an ongoing thing from before Oswald even woke up that morning, so Baker's not mentioning the specific lunchroom location is not the condemning evidence he so indirectly tip toes around.
Jim asks us to believe that with all the confirmed Dallas Police Department covert involvement at the Texas Theater that none of that existed at the Police Station after Oswald was arrested and brought there and that Baker was a clean boy scout who would honestly report all that happened faithfully - even though you had a full set of Dallas PD that just escorted a CIA double out the back door of the Texas Theater a short while earlier. He gives no weight to the fact one of the media reports said Baker confronted Oswald sitting and eating his lunch at the table. Since Oswald was seen doing that by Carolyn Arnold 6 1/2 minutes earlier there is every possibility that Oswald's lunch was still laid out on the table and that even though Baker confronted Oswald by the lunchroom door that Baker and Truly saw his lunch spread out on the table and knew he had been in there eating it the whole time. What Jim DiEugenio and his new brain partner Bart Kamp do is stand all the known motives for Dallas Police misreporting on their head and make Baker's omission a sign of the event never happening instead of the obvious need to prevent an alibi for Oswald that it almost certainly was. I wonder if Jim approves of Bart's attacking Carolyn Arnold and bringing his real story-interpreter Greg Parker in to tell us what Carolyn was really thinking? Maybe there's a Lancer award waiting for Greg too?
Common sense tells you if you transpose the Gestapo level of covert police corruption at the Texas Theater to the Police Station that Baker's blurring the lunchroom encounter to a vague 3rd or 4th floor stairwell removes the problem of Oswald obviously being seen eating lunch in the lunchroom during the shooting and not possibly being close enough to the Sniper's Nest to even be considered as a shooter. Another thing Jim ignores is how faithful to the conspiracy the Oswald who was captured remained. A profiling of this loyalty makes it very likely that this Oswald followed covert instructions to not be seen by the Secret Service during the motorcade and stayed in the lunchroom accordingly. This Oswald would need to be kept from the 6th floor in order not to interfere with his being set-up. The lunchroom where Carolyn Arnold saw him makes very much sense in this light. Both the amount of covert control and loyalty of the patsy make his being on the landing highly unlikely.
What Bart never considers is that Fritz's notes were being kept to a certain spacing in order to maintain evenly-spaced columns. I very much think that Fritz wrote "Claims 2nd floor Coke when officer came in to 1st floor". The next line is a shorthand summation of (Where he just) "Had lunch". In this case the delay in reporting the lunchroom encounter was merely so the conspirators could get the official story together and make sure the lunchroom encounter didn't prohibit it. You guys have it backwards and in this true context its lack of mention was actually proof of its realness and need to cover-up its exoneration of Oswald.
When you point-out to Jim that Kamp needs to deny Armstrong to make his clumsy manipulations work Jim ignores it and accuses you of having an 'agenda'...This is a primitive, far inferior examination of the evidence that blindly misses most of the higher intrigue in order to force the real agenda here...
Jim continues to stubbornly ignore that the conspiracy was an ongoing thing from before Oswald even woke up that morning, so Baker's not mentioning the specific lunchroom location is not the condemning evidence he so indirectly tip toes around.
Jim asks us to believe that with all the confirmed Dallas Police Department covert involvement at the Texas Theater that none of that existed at the Police Station after Oswald was arrested and brought there and that Baker was a clean boy scout who would honestly report all that happened faithfully - even though you had a full set of Dallas PD that just escorted a CIA double out the back door of the Texas Theater a short while earlier. He gives no weight to the fact one of the media reports said Baker confronted Oswald sitting and eating his lunch at the table. Since Oswald was seen doing that by Carolyn Arnold 6 1/2 minutes earlier there is every possibility that Oswald's lunch was still laid out on the table and that even though Baker confronted Oswald by the lunchroom door that Baker and Truly saw his lunch spread out on the table and knew he had been in there eating it the whole time. What Jim DiEugenio and his new brain partner Bart Kamp do is stand all the known motives for Dallas Police misreporting on their head and make Baker's omission a sign of the event never happening instead of the obvious need to prevent an alibi for Oswald that it almost certainly was. I wonder if Jim approves of Bart's attacking Carolyn Arnold and bringing his real story-interpreter Greg Parker in to tell us what Carolyn was really thinking? Maybe there's a Lancer award waiting for Greg too?
Common sense tells you if you transpose the Gestapo level of covert police corruption at the Texas Theater to the Police Station that Baker's blurring the lunchroom encounter to a vague 3rd or 4th floor stairwell removes the problem of Oswald obviously being seen eating lunch in the lunchroom during the shooting and not possibly being close enough to the Sniper's Nest to even be considered as a shooter. Another thing Jim ignores is how faithful to the conspiracy the Oswald who was captured remained. A profiling of this loyalty makes it very likely that this Oswald followed covert instructions to not be seen by the Secret Service during the motorcade and stayed in the lunchroom accordingly. This Oswald would need to be kept from the 6th floor in order not to interfere with his being set-up. The lunchroom where Carolyn Arnold saw him makes very much sense in this light. Both the amount of covert control and loyalty of the patsy make his being on the landing highly unlikely.
What Bart never considers is that Fritz's notes were being kept to a certain spacing in order to maintain evenly-spaced columns. I very much think that Fritz wrote "Claims 2nd floor Coke when officer came in to 1st floor". The next line is a shorthand summation of (Where he just) "Had lunch". In this case the delay in reporting the lunchroom encounter was merely so the conspirators could get the official story together and make sure the lunchroom encounter didn't prohibit it. You guys have it backwards and in this true context its lack of mention was actually proof of its realness and need to cover-up its exoneration of Oswald.
When you point-out to Jim that Kamp needs to deny Armstrong to make his clumsy manipulations work Jim ignores it and accuses you of having an 'agenda'...This is a primitive, far inferior examination of the evidence that blindly misses most of the higher intrigue in order to force the real agenda here...