10-02-2021, 06:54 PM
My apologies on this further correction- which at least makes the essay version correct (just about).
Calvery was certified as the dark-haired woman at the base of the steps, based on her plaid skirt. That's Carol Reed beside her in a white outfit. Kudos to Sandy Larsen & Tommy Graves at the EdForum for making that hard-won ID.
I can't see why "Running Woman" is not also Calvery, although my source tells me it's Karen Hicks. The ID of Running Woman doesn't affect the Lovelady/Molina determination.
The reason I brought up that determination - which wasn't in Armstrong's essay- was that while fishing for Lovelady's Couch-film images, I came across that contemporary EdForum discussion, where they were using the passenger-elevator hypothesis to justify IDing Lovelady halfway up the steps. It struck me right off the bat that the lingering figure was Molina.
That Lovelady/Molina determination is only fuel for the bigger argument that Shelley & Lovelady did not return directly inside after the shots. I made a solid case that they didn't, and did open with the caveat that "this question is still open to interpretation and is not unequivocal."
So the set-up punch puts this question weak on its knees. The knockout is delivered by the non-shutoff of the electrical power. Float like a butterfly, sting like a bee.
I'll sleep better, knowing that the information in this essay is as correct as I could get it.
****************
When are you arrogant egomaniacs with inferiority complexes ever going to endorse my west elevator escape theory? I've been building it piece by piece for 17 years now, ever since my original epiphany when I first read Dougherty's testimony at half-speed at my old college library. And it's gotten stronger and stronger, through trial & error and further realizations. Isn't that how lasting scientific truth emerges?
Is it your emotional and intellectual immaturity that is holding you back? Do you prefer the safety of the Bolshevik Politburo that lords over this research community? How the hell can I present this thesis to the mainstream world without your support? Are you part of the problem, or part of the solution?
We've lost America to the socialists, partly because our leaders have been too chickenshit to acknowledge that their same US Government murdered John F. Kennedy. And part of the blame for that falls squarely on the shoulders of this JFK reseacrh community.
Marina Oswald's 1988 prophecy has come true: "The danger of the truth not being known will destroy this nation, actually. Now maybe you don't believe me, but that's the fact."
Do you not understand that every single time socialists seize power, they liquidate large portions of the population? Is JFK research a (glug, glug, glug) fun parlor game for you, or will you drop your sorry-ass ego and somehow help bring this valid solution (west elevator escape) to the mainstream world?
Our time is short.
Calvery was certified as the dark-haired woman at the base of the steps, based on her plaid skirt. That's Carol Reed beside her in a white outfit. Kudos to Sandy Larsen & Tommy Graves at the EdForum for making that hard-won ID.
I can't see why "Running Woman" is not also Calvery, although my source tells me it's Karen Hicks. The ID of Running Woman doesn't affect the Lovelady/Molina determination.
The reason I brought up that determination - which wasn't in Armstrong's essay- was that while fishing for Lovelady's Couch-film images, I came across that contemporary EdForum discussion, where they were using the passenger-elevator hypothesis to justify IDing Lovelady halfway up the steps. It struck me right off the bat that the lingering figure was Molina.
That Lovelady/Molina determination is only fuel for the bigger argument that Shelley & Lovelady did not return directly inside after the shots. I made a solid case that they didn't, and did open with the caveat that "this question is still open to interpretation and is not unequivocal."
So the set-up punch puts this question weak on its knees. The knockout is delivered by the non-shutoff of the electrical power. Float like a butterfly, sting like a bee.
I'll sleep better, knowing that the information in this essay is as correct as I could get it.
****************
When are you arrogant egomaniacs with inferiority complexes ever going to endorse my west elevator escape theory? I've been building it piece by piece for 17 years now, ever since my original epiphany when I first read Dougherty's testimony at half-speed at my old college library. And it's gotten stronger and stronger, through trial & error and further realizations. Isn't that how lasting scientific truth emerges?
Is it your emotional and intellectual immaturity that is holding you back? Do you prefer the safety of the Bolshevik Politburo that lords over this research community? How the hell can I present this thesis to the mainstream world without your support? Are you part of the problem, or part of the solution?
We've lost America to the socialists, partly because our leaders have been too chickenshit to acknowledge that their same US Government murdered John F. Kennedy. And part of the blame for that falls squarely on the shoulders of this JFK reseacrh community.
Marina Oswald's 1988 prophecy has come true: "The danger of the truth not being known will destroy this nation, actually. Now maybe you don't believe me, but that's the fact."
Do you not understand that every single time socialists seize power, they liquidate large portions of the population? Is JFK research a (glug, glug, glug) fun parlor game for you, or will you drop your sorry-ass ego and somehow help bring this valid solution (west elevator escape) to the mainstream world?
Our time is short.