05-03-2010, 12:35 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-03-2010, 12:39 PM by James H. Fetzer.)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/04...reloaded=1
On his upcoming project re: the JFK assassination:
"We're going to do the American public a service," Hanks says. "A lot of
conspiracy types are going to be upset. If we do it right it'll perhaps be one
of the most controversial things that has ever been on TV."
So I added a comment, which did not show up--probably because of some
typos, I supposed--so I posted another, which, to my surprise, was posted:
It would be great is Nelson actually knew what he was talking about for a
change. By the simple expedient of determining where the bullet that struck
JFK hit his back, it is possible refute--conclusively--the "magic bullet"
theory. Michael Baden, M.D., has observed that, if the "magic bullet" theory
is false, then there have to have been at least six shots from three
directions. It is not only false but is not even anatomically possible. You
can download the proof, which includes the shirt and jacket that he was
wearing, autopsy and FBI diagrams, his personal physician's death
certificate, and reenactment photographs, which is archived at
http://www.assassinationscience.com/Reas...ations.pdf
I have been a fan of Tom Hanks, but in this case, he is on the wrong side
of logic, evidence, and history.
Then my webmaster send me a snag showing that both had been posted,
after all, typos and all. Hanks is making a huge mistake in undertaking this.
![[Image: 33pap9i.jpg]](http://i50.tinypic.com/33pap9i.jpg)
On his upcoming project re: the JFK assassination:
"We're going to do the American public a service," Hanks says. "A lot of
conspiracy types are going to be upset. If we do it right it'll perhaps be one
of the most controversial things that has ever been on TV."
So I added a comment, which did not show up--probably because of some
typos, I supposed--so I posted another, which, to my surprise, was posted:
It would be great is Nelson actually knew what he was talking about for a
change. By the simple expedient of determining where the bullet that struck
JFK hit his back, it is possible refute--conclusively--the "magic bullet"
theory. Michael Baden, M.D., has observed that, if the "magic bullet" theory
is false, then there have to have been at least six shots from three
directions. It is not only false but is not even anatomically possible. You
can download the proof, which includes the shirt and jacket that he was
wearing, autopsy and FBI diagrams, his personal physician's death
certificate, and reenactment photographs, which is archived at
http://www.assassinationscience.com/Reas...ations.pdf
I have been a fan of Tom Hanks, but in this case, he is on the wrong side
of logic, evidence, and history.
Then my webmaster send me a snag showing that both had been posted,
after all, typos and all. Hanks is making a huge mistake in undertaking this.