23-02-2012, 09:24 AM
This book talks about the same Cooper. Also John McAdams (surprise surprise) has an article about him.
[URL="http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/weberman/jcooper.htm"]http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/weberman/jcooper.htm
I[/URL]s it a coincidence that McAdams has presented two theories in his site blaming the military industrial complex?
The other story is about Garrison's phone call to journalist Hincle [URL="http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/jimloon1.htm"]http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/jimloon1.htm
A[/URL]lthough McAdams does not agree with tis theories he mention them as possibilities. By presenting a theory that blames Fred Korth,
an ex CIA man Cabell with ties to military complex, and naming Oswald a DIA agent absolves the CIA and
the real instigators. Isn't that what his purpose is?
And the act of retribution argues that individuals like Cabell and Korth who represented General Dynamics
revenged JFK out of personal motives. How convenient. So you can add Ferd Korth and General Cabell to the list
of false sponsors.
[URL="http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/weberman/jcooper.htm"]http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/weberman/jcooper.htm
I[/URL]s it a coincidence that McAdams has presented two theories in his site blaming the military industrial complex?
The other story is about Garrison's phone call to journalist Hincle [URL="http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/jimloon1.htm"]http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/jimloon1.htm
A[/URL]lthough McAdams does not agree with tis theories he mention them as possibilities. By presenting a theory that blames Fred Korth,
an ex CIA man Cabell with ties to military complex, and naming Oswald a DIA agent absolves the CIA and
the real instigators. Isn't that what his purpose is?
And the act of retribution argues that individuals like Cabell and Korth who represented General Dynamics
revenged JFK out of personal motives. How convenient. So you can add Ferd Korth and General Cabell to the list
of false sponsors.