01-09-2014, 11:17 PM
What I am suggesting is, if the bullet passed thru the head from front to back and exited to the back, it carried away some of its kinetic energy, and could not have transferred 100% of its momentum to the head. The motion of the head backward contains more energy than can be added by one bullet (even at 100%). I just don't believe the quasi-medical explanation that the force was muscular spasms or anything like that (for the good and simple reason that no one seems to be able to have ever documented this effect before). The melon-jet effect by itself (which requires a bullet from the rear - but at least it has been documented) doesn't seem to add a force of sufficient magnitude, or duration, to push the head that fast or that far.
For the head to move backward so fast, something else must also have occurred. And Bob P. is fixing to tell us what that is, hopefully sooner rather than later.
For the head to move backward so fast, something else must also have occurred. And Bob P. is fixing to tell us what that is, hopefully sooner rather than later.
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."