09-08-2019, 03:23 PM
The Ulfkotta book on the BND (German Intel) has so far yielded some new (to me) information.
He goes through the ancient history and recent history of BND/CIA operations. The most prominent new information he presents is:
1. Stalin had spies in the US atomic bomb projects from 1943 onwards. There were actually four teams of Soviet spies. They were at Los Alamos, Oak Ridge TN, Chicago and California.
2. Stalin's inside information was able to tell him exactly how many Atom bombs the US could have possessed (based on the production of uranium 235 and plutonium).
3. This, in turn, allowed Stalin to heat up the 1948 Berlin Crisis to spread the U S nuclear forces thin, so that the U S couldn't use atom bombs to aid Chiang Kai-Shek in China.
Ulfkotte also explains events such as the 1979 Iran Crisis and the 1982 Falklands War in a fairly new and unique way. Also, he claims that the sale of narcotics was, as of 1997, supporting the Afghanistan War as far as the US was sponsoring conflict there in 1997. His claims about Afghanistan seem, in retrospect, very accurate as far as a prediction. The bottom line was that the CIA was profiting off of the opium grown in Afghanistan.
Maybe that explains why Alexander the Great, the Russians, the UK and now the US have been fixated on Afghanistan. (I'm referring to the narcotics trade).
More to follow.
James Lateer
He goes through the ancient history and recent history of BND/CIA operations. The most prominent new information he presents is:
1. Stalin had spies in the US atomic bomb projects from 1943 onwards. There were actually four teams of Soviet spies. They were at Los Alamos, Oak Ridge TN, Chicago and California.
2. Stalin's inside information was able to tell him exactly how many Atom bombs the US could have possessed (based on the production of uranium 235 and plutonium).
3. This, in turn, allowed Stalin to heat up the 1948 Berlin Crisis to spread the U S nuclear forces thin, so that the U S couldn't use atom bombs to aid Chiang Kai-Shek in China.
Ulfkotte also explains events such as the 1979 Iran Crisis and the 1982 Falklands War in a fairly new and unique way. Also, he claims that the sale of narcotics was, as of 1997, supporting the Afghanistan War as far as the US was sponsoring conflict there in 1997. His claims about Afghanistan seem, in retrospect, very accurate as far as a prediction. The bottom line was that the CIA was profiting off of the opium grown in Afghanistan.
Maybe that explains why Alexander the Great, the Russians, the UK and now the US have been fixated on Afghanistan. (I'm referring to the narcotics trade).
More to follow.
James Lateer