05-05-2013, 11:19 PM
Oswald isn't recreated in the window. Accurate to reality for once do I find the Confuseum. But I have to ask;
'Who was in the window but was left out of Mr. Dunkel's magic recreation'?
Matched to go with the Confuseum's magik-bullets?
Shoot around the corner magik Pb lead alchemy?
Nah....doubt abounds :nono:
The fable falls even by their own words:
[from Phil Dragoo's post ]
"J. Wesley Liebler, the commission counsel responsible for this section of the Warren Report, stated that "the fact is that not one person alive today (including Marina) ever saw that rifle in the Paine garage in such a way it could be identified as being that (Oswald's) rifle."
From outside the commission, the refutation of the LN Fable is even stronger.
Even the commission members couldn't stand by their own conclusions, therefore why should anyone else? Why so? See "Breach of Trust" and even "Accessories After the Facts" or Walt Brown's "Warren Omission".
Knowing that it was a fixed case even before the murder, how can it be mistaken research conclusions when Mr. Gil Jesus and Mr. George Evica write that LHOswald didn't:
from Phil Dragoo's post:
"order, pay for, receive, practice with, pose with, store, transport, use, or conceal the prop planted in the Kabuki stage."
(great imagery)
John Armstrong in H & L did fine work on both the rifle and the money order records fable(s). Exposed as bullsh*t. I find this part of his book particularly strong.
George O'Toole found strong indications that Wesley Frasier was lying about many "facts" to the WC in his testimony.
So I conclude, no Oswald rifle, no Oswald paper bundle and no Oswald paper bag.
More Fable of Ed Lansdale's cover and deception crews.
I do think there was an Oswald coke involved later in the domino room.
'Who was in the window but was left out of Mr. Dunkel's magic recreation'?
Matched to go with the Confuseum's magik-bullets?
Shoot around the corner magik Pb lead alchemy?
Nah....doubt abounds :nono:
The fable falls even by their own words:
[from Phil Dragoo's post ]
"J. Wesley Liebler, the commission counsel responsible for this section of the Warren Report, stated that "the fact is that not one person alive today (including Marina) ever saw that rifle in the Paine garage in such a way it could be identified as being that (Oswald's) rifle."
From outside the commission, the refutation of the LN Fable is even stronger.
Even the commission members couldn't stand by their own conclusions, therefore why should anyone else? Why so? See "Breach of Trust" and even "Accessories After the Facts" or Walt Brown's "Warren Omission".
Knowing that it was a fixed case even before the murder, how can it be mistaken research conclusions when Mr. Gil Jesus and Mr. George Evica write that LHOswald didn't:
from Phil Dragoo's post:
"order, pay for, receive, practice with, pose with, store, transport, use, or conceal the prop planted in the Kabuki stage."
(great imagery)
John Armstrong in H & L did fine work on both the rifle and the money order records fable(s). Exposed as bullsh*t. I find this part of his book particularly strong.
George O'Toole found strong indications that Wesley Frasier was lying about many "facts" to the WC in his testimony.
So I conclude, no Oswald rifle, no Oswald paper bundle and no Oswald paper bag.
More Fable of Ed Lansdale's cover and deception crews.
I do think there was an Oswald coke involved later in the domino room.
Read not to contradict and confute;
nor to believe and take for granted;
nor to find talk and discourse;
but to weigh and consider.
FRANCIS BACON
nor to believe and take for granted;
nor to find talk and discourse;
but to weigh and consider.
FRANCIS BACON